Skip to main content

“Defence-in-Depth” Strategy in Transport Risk Management

  • Conference paper
Transport Systems Telematics (TST 2010)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 104))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Safety management is a kind of system management, that is management by purposes. Taking “defence-in-depth” strategy, DDS – there can be defined four main aims and four method groups of risk management in transport: 1. minimizing transport accidents risk; 2. minimizing number of undesirable transport events (incidents, conflicts, collisions, accidents). Above purposes relate stages of safety management in transport. At each level of management should be elaborated methods, procedures and technologies of minimizing transport accidents risk. According to DDS any management system of transport safety should have a structure of multilevel chain protections which supervise main transport processes. About those problems in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heinrich, H.W.: Industrial accidents prevention: A scientific approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dong, Z., Niansheng, X.: Accident causation and prevention theories. In: Qingxuan, Z., et al. (eds.) Progres in Safety Science and Technology. Proceedings of the 98 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology, pp. 61–66. Science Press, Beijing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hollnagel, E.: Accident analysis and barrier functions. IFE (N). Version 1.0, 99/09/30 (February 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hollnagel, E.: Barier Analysis and Accident Prevention. Human - Technology Integration Colloquium Series. Air Forses Research Laboratory, Finland (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, R.I., Woods, D.: A Tale of Two Stories: Contrasting Views of Patient Safety. In: Report from a Workshop on Assembling the Scientific Basis for Progress on Patient Safety. National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA, pp. 13–14(1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kjellen, U.: Prevention of accidents througth experience feedback. Taylor & Francis, London (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Runyan, C.W.: Using the Haddon Matrix: introducing the third dimension. Injury Prevention 4, 302–307 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Reason, J.: Managing the Risk of Organizational Accident. Aldershot, Ashgate (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasman, H.J.: Safety will save costs, but how much ist he question! In: Qingxuan, Z., et al. (eds.) Progress in Safety Science and Technology. Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology, Beijing, New York, pp. 371–372 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. NORSOK Standard, Design Principles /Technical Safety, Norwegian Technology Standards Institution, Oslo, S-DP-001, Rev.1 (December 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 17776 Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries – Offshore Production Installations-Guidelines on Tools and Techniques for Hazard identification and Risk Assessment (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector, Part 1: Framework, Definitions, Systems, Hardware and Software, Requirements (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. NORSOK Standard, Technical Safety, Norwegian Technology Standards Institution, Oslo, S-001, Rev.3 (January 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duijm, N.J., et al.: Evaluating and Managing Safety Barriers in Major Hazard Plants. In: PSAM 7– ESREL 2004. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Svenson, O.: The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries. Risk Analysis 11(3), 499–507 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. In Depth Defence applied to Information Systems. Version 1.1 – (July 19, 2004); This document was produced by the DCSSI Advisory Office (SGDN / DCSSI / SDO / BCS)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Szymanek, A. (2010). “Defence-in-Depth” Strategy in Transport Risk Management. In: Mikulski, J. (eds) Transport Systems Telematics. TST 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 104. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16472-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16472-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16471-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16472-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics