Skip to main content

KBB: A Knowledge-Bundle Builder for Research Studies

  • Conference paper
Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Applications and Challenges (ER 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6413))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Researchers struggle to manage vast amounts of data coming from hundreds of sources in online repositories. To successfully conduct research studies, researchers need to find, retrieve, filter, extract, integrate, organize, and share information in a timely and high-precision manner. Active conceptual modeling for learning can give researchers the tools they need to perform their tasks in a more efficient, user-friendly, and computer-supported way. The idea is to create “knowledge bundles” (KBs), which are conceptual-model representations of organized information superimposed over a collection of source documents. A “knowledge-bundle builder” (KBB) helps researchers develop KBs in a synergistic and incremental manner and is a manifestation of learning in terms of its semi-automatic construction of KBs. An implemented KBB prototype shows both the feasibility of the idea and the opportunities for further research and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, P.H.: Reverse engineering of data. IBM Systems Journal 37(2), 246–269 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Kamha, R., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W.: Foundational data modeling and schema transformations for XML data engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International United Information Systems Conferences (UNISCON 2008), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 25–36 (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Sintek, M.: Towards linguistically grounded ontologies. In: Aroyo, L., Traverso, P., Ciravegna, F., Cimiano, P., Heath, T., Hyvönen, E., Mizoguchi, R., Oren, E., Sabou, M., Simperl, E. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cimiano, P.: Ontology Learning and Population from Text: Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Lonsdale, D., Nagy, G., Tijerino, Y., Clawson, R., Crabtree, J., Ding, Y., Jha, P., Lian, Z., Lynn, S., Padmanabhan, R.K., Peters, J., Tao, C., Watts, R., Woodbury, C., Zitzelberger, A.: A conceptual-model-based computational alembic for a web of knowledge. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 532–533. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Embley, D.W.: Programming with data frames for everyday data items. In: Proceedings of the 1980 National Computer Conference, pp. 301–305, Anaheim, California (May 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatterbauer, W., Bohunsky, P., Herzog, M., Krüpl, B., Pollak, B.: Towards domain-independent information extraction from web tables. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2007), Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 71–80 (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter, L., Lu, Z., Firby, J., Baumgartner Jr., W.A., Johnson, H.L., Ogren, P.V., Cohen, K.B.: OpenDMAP: An open source, ontology-driven, concept analysis engine, with applications to capturing knowledge regarding protein transport, protein interactions and cell-type-specific gene expression. BMC Bioinformatics 9(8) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ludascher, B., Altintas, I., Berkley, C., Higgins, D., Jaeger, E., Jones, M., Lee, E.A., Tao, J., Zhao, Y.: Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 18(10), 1039–1065 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lian, Z.: A tool to support ontology creation based on incremental mini-ontology merging. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lynn, S.: Automating mini-ontology generation from canonical tables. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mian, N.A., Hussain, T.: Database reverse engineering tools. In: Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 206–211 (February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Padmanabhan, R.K.: Table abstraction tool. Master’s thesis, Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York (May 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plato. Theaetetus. BiblioBazaar, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, about 360BC (translated by Benjamin Jowett)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pivk, A., Sure, Y., Cimiano, P., Gams, M., Rajkovič, V., Studer, R.: Transforming arbitrary tables into logical form with TARTAR. Data & Knowledge Engineering 60, 567–595 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarawagi, S.: Information extraction. Foundations and Trends in Databases 1(3), 261–377 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tao, C.: Ontology Generation, Information Harvesting and Semantic Annotation for Machine-Generated Web Pages. PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, Department of Computer Science (December 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tao, C., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W.: FOCIH: Form-based ontology creation and information harvesting. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2009), Gramado, Brazil, November 2009, pp. 346–359 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, L., Embley, D.W.: A composite approach to automating direct and indirect schema mappings. Information Systems 31(8), 697–732 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, L., Embley, D.W.: Categorization of web documents using extraction ontologies. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 3(1), 3–20 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Lonsdale, D.W., Stewart, A., Tao, C. (2010). KBB: A Knowledge-Bundle Builder for Research Studies. In: Trujillo, J., et al. Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Applications and Challenges. ER 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16385-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16385-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16384-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16385-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics