How do the Key Determinants of a Distributed Planning Process Impact on the Performance of a Supply Chain?

  • Julien François
  • Uche Okongwu
  • Jean-Christophe Deschamps
  • Matthieu Lauras
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 338)


As firms search to maximise value through the effective management of their various business activities, it is increasingly important to identify and understand the key factors that can significantly impact on the performance of the supply chain. The Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model enables to identify four distinct processes (plan, source, make and deliver) that constitute a supply chain. If many researchers have studied the last three processes (source, make and deliver), the relationship between the determinants of the planning process and supply chain performance has not been sufficiently explored. This paper therefore aims to identify and analyse the determinants of a distributed planning process that impact on the performance of a supply chain, including both financial and non-financial elements. It proposes a conceptual framework and a simulation model that can be used to improve the performance of a supply chain in terms of efficiency, flexibility, effectiveness and responsiveness.


Planning process supply chain management performance measurement flexibility efficiency effectiveness responsiveness 


  1. 1.
    Chase, R.B., Jacobs, F.R., Aquilano, N.J.: Operations management for competitive advantage. McGraw-Hill, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Man, R., Burns, T.R.: Sustainability: supply chains, partner linkages, and new forms of self-regulation. Human Systems Management 25, 1–12 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Francois, J., Deschamps, J.C., Fontan, G., Bourrieres, J.P.: Assessing the impact of control architectures on Supply Chains performances. In: 4th International Workshop on Performance Measurement, Bordeaux, France (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    François, J., Deschamps, J.-C., Fontan, G., Bourrieres, J.P.: Collaborative planning for enterprises involved in different supply chains. In: IEEE SSSM 2006, International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Troyes, France (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naylor, J.B., Naim, M.M., Berry, D.: Leagility: interfacing the lean and agile manufacturing paradigm in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 107–118 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olhager, J., Selldin, E.: Manufacturing planning and control approaches: market alignment and performance. International Journal of Production Research 45(6), 1469–1484 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rainbird, M.: Demand and supply chains: the value catalyst. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 34(3/4), 230–250 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reiner, G., Hofmann, P.: Efficiency analysis of supply chain processes. International Journal of Production Research 44(23), 5065–5087 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slack, N., Chambers, S., Johnston, R.: Operations management. Prentice Hall, London (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stevenson, W.J.: Operations management. McGraw-Hill, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wacker, J.G., Sheu, C.: Effectiveness of manufacturing planning and control systems on manufacturing competitiveness: evidence from global manufacturing data. International Journal of Production Research 44(5), 1015–1036 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walters, D.: Effectiveness and efficiency: the role of supply chains management. The International Journal of Logistics Management 17(1), 75–94 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zokaei, K., Hines, P.: Achieving consumer focus in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 37(3), 223–247 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julien François
    • 1
  • Uche Okongwu
    • 2
  • Jean-Christophe Deschamps
    • 1
  • Matthieu Lauras
    • 3
  1. 1.IMSUniversity of BordeauxTalence(France)
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Organisation, Logistics and TechnologyToulouse Business SchoolToulouse Cedex 7(France)
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversité de Toulouse, Mines AlbiAlbi Cedex 9(France)

Personalised recommendations