Skip to main content

Using Causal Relationships to Deal with the Ramification Problem in Action Formalisms Based on Description Logics

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6397))

Abstract

In the reasoning about actions community, causal relationships have been proposed as a possible approach for solving the ramification problem, i.e., the problem of how to deal with indirect effects of actions. In this paper, we show that causal relationships can be added to action formalisms based on Description Logics (DLs) without destroying the decidability of the consistency and the projection problem. We investigate the complexity of these decision problems based on which DL is used as base logic for the action formalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Lippmann, M., Liu, H.: Adding causal relationships to DL-based action formalisms. LTCS-Report 10-01, Chair of Automata Theory, Technische Universität Dresden (2010), http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html

  3. Baader, F., Lutz, C., Miličić, M., Sattler, U., Wolter, F.: Integrating description logics and action formalisms: First results. In: Proceedings of AAAI-2005 and IAAI-2005, pp. 572–577. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2005) Short version of [4]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Miličić, M., Lutz, C., Sattler, U., Wolter, F.: Integrating description logics and action formalisms for reasoning about web services. LTCS-Report 05-02, Chair of Automata Theory, Technische Universität Dresden (2005), Long version of [3], http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html

  5. De Giacomo, G.: Decidability of Class-Based Knowledge Representation Formalisms. PhD thesis, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Denecker, M., Theseider-Dupré, D., van Belleghem, K.: An inductive definition approach to ramifications. Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 3(7), 1–43 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herzig, A.: The PMA revisited. In: Proceedings of KR-1996, pp. 40–50 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, F.: Embracing causality in specifying the indirect effects of actions. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-1995, pp. 1985–1993 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, H., Lutz, C., Miličić, M., Wolter, F.: Reasoning about actions using description logics with general TBoxes. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 266–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H., Lutz, C., Miličić, M., Wolter, F.: Updating description logic ABoxes. In: Proceedings of KR-2006, pp. 46–56. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y., Lakemeyer, G.: On first-order definability and computability of progression for local-effect actions and beyond. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-2009, pp. 860–866 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Y., Levesque, H.J.: Tractable reasoning in first-order knowledge bases with disjunctive information. In: Proceedings of AAAI-2005 and IAAI-2005, pp. 639–644. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reiter, R.: Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Describing and Implementing Dynamical Systems. The MIT Press, Bradford Books (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaerf, A.: Reasoning with individuals in concept languages. Data Knowledge Engineering 13(2), 141–176 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thielscher, M.: Ramification and causality. AIJ 89(1–2), 317–364 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Thielscher, M.: Reasoning Robots: The Art and Science of Programming Robotic Agents. Applied Logic Series, vol. 33. Springer, Netherlands (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. van Belleghem, K., Denecker, M., Theseider-Dupré, D.: A constructive approach to the ramification problem. In: Proceedings of ESSLLI-1998, pp. 1–17 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winslett, M.: Reasoning about action using a possible models approach. In: Proceedings of AAAI-1988, pp. 89–93 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Lippmann, M., Liu, H. (2010). Using Causal Relationships to Deal with the Ramification Problem in Action Formalisms Based on Description Logics. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6397. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16241-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16242-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics