Abstract
Natural deduction for intuitionistic linear logic is known to be full of non-deterministic choices. In order to control these choices, we combine ideas from intercalation and focusing to arrive at the calculus of focused natural deduction. The calculus is shown to be sound and complete with respect to first-order intuitionistic linear natural deduction and the backward linear focusing calculus.
This work was in part supported by NABITT grant 2106-07-0019 of the Danish Strategic Research Council.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andreoli, J.: Logic programming with focusing proofs in linear logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(3), 297 (1992)
Chaudhuri, K.: Focusing strategies in the sequent calculus of synthetic connectives. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5330, pp. 467–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Chaudhuri, K., Miller, D., Saurin, A.: Canonical sequent proofs via multi-focusing. In: Fifth International Conference on Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 273, pp. 383–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Chaudhuri, K., Pfenning, F., Price, G.: A logical characterization of forward and backward chaining in the inverse method. Journal of Automated Reasoning 40(2), 133–177 (2008)
Krishnaswami, N.R.: Focusing on pattern matching. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, pp. 366–378. ACM, New York (2009)
Licata, D.R., Zeilberger, N., Harper, R.: Focusing on binding and computation. In: LICS, pp. 241–252. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)
McLaughlin, S., Pfenning, F.: Efficient intuitionistic theorem proving with the polarized inverse method. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automated Deduction, p. 244. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Miller, D., Nadathur, G., Pfenning, F., Scedrov, A.: Uniform proofs as a foundation for logic programming. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 51(1-2), 125–157 (1991)
Prawitz, D.: Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm (1965)
Sieg, W., Byrnes, J.: Normal natural deduction proofs (in classical logic). Studia Logica 60(1), 67–106 (1998)
Watkins, K., Cervesato, I., Pfenning, F., Walker, D.: A concurrent logical framework: The propositional fragment. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M., Damiani, F. (eds.) TYPES 2003. LNCS, vol. 3085, pp. 355–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Zeilberger, N.: Focusing and higher-order abstract syntax. In: Necula, G.C., Wadler, P. (eds.) POPL, pp. 359–369. ACM, New York (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brock-Nannestad, T., Schürmann, C. (2010). Focused Natural Deduction. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6397. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16241-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16242-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)