Skip to main content

Assessing the Robustness of Complete Bacterial Genome Segmentations

  • Conference paper
Book cover Comparative Genomics (RECOMB-CG 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 6398))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Comparison of closely related bacterial genomes has revealed the presence of highly conserved sequences forming a ”backbone” that is interrupted by numerous, less conserved, DNA fragments. Segmentation of bacterial genomes into backbone and variable regions is particularly useful to investigate bacterial genome evolution. Several software tools have been designed to compare complete bacterial chromosomes and a few online databases store pre-computed genome comparisons. However, very few statistical methods are available to evaluate the reliability of these software tools and to compare the results obtained with them. To fill this gap, we have developed two local scores to measure the robustness of bacterial genome segmentations. Our method uses a simulation procedure based on random perturbations of the compared genomes. The scores presented in this paper are simple to implement and our results show that they allow to discriminate easily between robust and non-robust bacterial genome segmentations when using aligners such as MAUVE and MGA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B., Lander, E.S.: Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goto, N., Kurokawa, K., Yasunaga, T.: Analysis of invariant sequences in 266 complete genomes. Gene 401, 172–180 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Halpern, D., Chiapello, H., Schbath, S., Robin, S., Hennequet-Antier, C., Gruss, A., El Karoui, M.: Identification of DNA motifs implicated in maintenance of bacterial core genomes by predictive modeling. PLoS genet. 9, 153–160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi, T., Makino, K., Ohnishi, M., Kurokawa, K., Ishii, K., Yokoyama, K., Han, C.G., Ohtsubo, E., Nakayama, K., Murata, T., et al.: Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res. 8, 11–22 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiapello, H., Bourgait, I., Sourivong, F., Heuclin, G., Gendrault-Jacquemard, A., Petit, M.A., El Karoui, M.: Systematic determination of the mosaic structure of bacterial genomes: species backbone versus strain-specific loops. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 171–180 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Touchon, M., Hoede, C., Tenaillon, O., Barbe, V., Baeriswyl, S., Bidet, P., Bingen, E., Bonacorsi, S., Bouchier, C., Bouvet, O., et al.: Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia colispecies results in highly diverse adaptive paths. Plos Genet. 5, 1000344 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canchaya, C., Duperchy, E., Brussow, H.: The impact of prophages on bacterial chromosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 9–18 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prentice, M.B.: Bacterial comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 5, 338 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Touzain, F., Denamur, E., Médique, C., Barbe, V., El Karoui, M., Petit, M.A.: Small variable segments constitute a major type of diversity of bacterial genomes at the species level. Genome Biol. 11, R45 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, W.: Comparison of genomic DNA sequences: solved and unsolved problems. Bioinformatics 17, 391–397 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delcher, A.L., Kasif, S., Fleischmann, R.D., Peterson, J., White, O., Salzberg, S.L.: Alignment of whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2369–2376 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz, S., Phillipy, A., Delcher, A.L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., Salzberg, S.L.: Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R12 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Treangen, T.J., Messeguer, X.: M-GCAT: interactively and efficiently constructing large-scale multiple genome comparison frameworks in closely related species. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 433–447 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubchak, I., Pachter, L.: The computational challenges of applying comparative-based computational methods to whole genomes. Brief. Bioinformatics 3, 18–22 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prakash, A., Tompa, M.: Measuring the accuracy of genome-size multiple alignments. Genome Biol. 8, R124 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Margulies, E.H., Cooper, G.M., Asimenos, G., Thomas, D.J., Dewey, C.N., Siepel, A., Birney, E., Keefe, D., Schwartz, A.S., Hou, M., et al.: Analyses of deep mammalian sequence alignments and constraint predictions for 1% of the human genome. Genome Res. 17, 760–774 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Swidan, F., Shamir, R.: Assessing the quality of whole genome alignments in bacteria. Adv. Bioinformatics 1, 1–8 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitano, H.: Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 826–837 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyon, F., Guénoche, A.: Comparing bacterial genomes from linear orders of paterns. Discrete Appl. Math. 156, 1251–1262 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoebeke, M., Nicolas, P., Bessieres, P.: MuGeN: simultaneous exploration of multiple genomes and computer analysis results. Bioinformatics 19, 859–864 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deloger, M., El Karoui, M., Petit, M.A.: A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J. Bacteriol. 191, 91–99 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Höhl, M., Kurtz, S., Ohlebusch, E.: Efficient multiple genome alignment. Bioinformatics 18, S312–S320 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Darling, A.C., Mau, B., Blattner, F.R., Perna, N.T.: Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 15, 184–194 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiapello, H., Gendrault, A., Caron, C., Blum, J., Petit, M.A., El Karoui, M.: MOSAIC: an online database dedicated to the comparative genomics of bacterial strains at the intra-species level. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 498–506 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubchak, I., Poliakov, A., Kislyuk, A., Brudno, M.: Multiple whole-genome alignments without a reference organism. Genome Res. 19, 682–689 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaudhuri, R.R., Pallen, M.J.: xBASE, a collection of online databases for bacterial comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 335–337 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abouelhoda, M.I., Kurtz, S., Ohlebusch, E.: CoCoNUT: an efficient system for the comparison and analysis of genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 456–462 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Devillers, H., Chiapello, H., Schbath, S., El Karoui, M. (2010). Assessing the Robustness of Complete Bacterial Genome Segmentations. In: Tannier, E. (eds) Comparative Genomics. RECOMB-CG 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16181-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16181-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16180-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16181-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics