Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bestimmung der femoralen und tibialen Rotation bei Revisionsimplantaten

  • Chapter
Revisionsendoprothetik des Kniegelenks

  • 1345 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Indikation zur Revision einer Knieendoprothese muss aufgrund sehr unterschiedlicher Ursachen bzw. Komplikationen gestellt werden. Dazu gehören am häufigsten Polyethylenabrieb, aseptische Lockerung, Instabilität und Infektionen. Aber auch ungenügende Achsausrichtung und Implantatfehlpositionen sowie Arthrofibrose führen zunehmend zum Prothesenversagen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2751–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 420:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 356:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Flannery NMP (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gollwitzer H, Burgkart R, Diehl P, Gradinger R, Bühren V (2006) Therapie der Arthrofibrose nach Kniegelenkendoprothetik. Orthopäde 35:143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M (2007) Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T (2003) Rotationsfehlstellungen der Komponenten als Ursache chronischer Schmerzen und vorzeitigem Prothesenversagen bei Knieendoprothesen. Orthopäde 32:469–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JN (1993) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly M, Aglietti P (Eds) Surgery of the knee. 2nd ed. Churchill-Livingstone, New York, pp 739–804

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jazrawi LM, Birdzell L, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE (2000) The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arhroplasty 15:761–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim Y-H Kim J-S, Choi Y, Kwon O-R (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:14–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther K-P, Kirschner S (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg B 87:1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:259–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharkey PF, Hozak WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop 404:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Witoolkollachit P, Seubchompoo O (2008) The comparison of femoral component rotational alignment with transepicondylar axis in mobile bearing TKA, CT-scan study. J Med Assoc Thai 91:1051–1058

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim, Marienburgerstraße 2, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Louis Hovy

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Louis Hovy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum Wels – Grieskirchen, Grieskirchner Straße 42, 4600, Wels, Österreich

    Klemens Trieb

  2. Orthopädsche Klinik Braunschweig, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Leipziger Str. 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Germany

    Karl-Dieter Heller

  3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany

    Dieter C. Wirtz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hovy, L. (2011). Bestimmung der femoralen und tibialen Rotation bei Revisionsimplantaten. In: Trieb, K., Heller, KD., Wirtz, D.C. (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik des Kniegelenks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16123-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16123-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16122-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16123-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation