Skip to main content

Transition Matrices: Properties and Estimation Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Basel II Risk Parameters

Abstract

In Chaps. 1–3 estimation methods for 1-year default probabilities have been presented. In many risk management applications a 1-year default probability is not sufficient because multi-year default probabilities or default probabilities corresponding to year fractions are needed. Practical examples in the context of retail loan pricing and risk management are presented in Chaps. 17 and 18. In other applications, like credit risk modelling, rating transitions, i.e. the probability that a debtor in rating grade i moves to rating grade j within a period of time, are of importance. In all cases, a 1-year transition matrix serves as the starting point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that by log(x) we mean the inverse of exp(x), not the logarithm to the base ten.

  2. 2.

    This is not true in general because there are cases where it is still possible to compute transition matrices for arbitrary time periods if the 1-year matrix contains zeros. The simplest example is the identity matrix. However, basically for all practically relevant cases it is true that no consistent t-year transition matrix can be computed from the one-year matrix where t is an arbitrary year fraction.

  3. 3.

    Note that our conclusion is contrary to Jafry and Schuermann (2004). In their analysis they end up recommending the duration method. However, it is not so clear in their article why the duration method should be superior. They basically show that in practical applications like portfolio credit risk modelling it makes a considerable difference if one uses a transition matrix based on the cohort method or based on the duration method. They do not analyze, however, if this difference comes from an estimation bias in the results for the duration method which is our conjecture.

References

  • Bluhm C, Overbeck L (2007), Calibration of PD Term Structures: To be Markov or not to be, Risk 20 (11), pp. 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm C, Overbeck L, Wagner C (2003), An Introduction to Credit Risk Modeling, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel RB, Rosenthal JS, Wei JZ (2001), Finding Generators for Markov Chains via Empirical Transition Matrices, with Applications to Credit Ratings, Mathematical Finance 11, pp. 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafry Y, Schuermann T (2004), Measurement and Estimation of Credit Migration Matrices, Journal of Banking and Finance 28 (11), pp. 2603–2639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreinin A, Sidelnikova M (2001), Regularization Algorithms for Transition Matrices, Algo Research Quarterly 4, pp. 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2008), Corporate Defaults and Recovery Rates 1920–2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Engelmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelmann, B., Ermakov, K. (2011). Transition Matrices: Properties and Estimation Methods. In: Engelmann, B., Rauhmeier, R. (eds) The Basel II Risk Parameters. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16114-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16114-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16113-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16114-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics