Skip to main content

Focused Belief Revision as a Model of Fallible Relevance-Sensitive Perception

  • Conference paper
KI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2637 Accesses

Abstract

We present a framework for incorporating perception-induced beliefs into the knowledge base of a rational agent. Normally, the agent accepts the propositional content of perception and other propositions that follow from it. Given the fallibility of perception, this may result in contradictory beliefs. Hence, we model high-level perception as belief revision. Adopting a classical AGM-style belief revision operator is problematic, since it implies that, as a result of perception, the agent will come to believe everything that follows from its new set of beliefs. We overcome this difficulty in two ways. First, we adopt a belief revision operator based on relevance logic, thus limiting the derived beliefs to those that relevantly follow from the new percept. Second, we focus belief revision on only a subset of the agent’s set of beliefs—those that we take to be within the agent’s current focus of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hexmoor, H., Lammens, J., Shapiro, S.C.: Embodiment in GLAIR: a grounded layered architecture with integrated reasoning for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of The Sixth Florida AI Research Symposium (FLAIRS 1993), pp. 325–329 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro, S.C., Ismail, H.O.: Anchoring in a grounded layered architecture with integrated reasoning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 43(2-3), 97–108 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourron, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, A., Belnap, N.: Entailment, vol. I. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Shoham, Y., del Val, A.: A logic for perception and belief. Technical Report STAN-CS-91-1391, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Musto, D., Konolige, K.: Reasoning about perception. In: Papers from the 1993 AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning about Mental States, pp. 90–95 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, J., Huang, Z.: Seeing is believing. In: Papers from the 4th Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, Commonsense 1998 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wooldridge, M., Lomuscio, A.: A computationally grounded logic of visibility, perception, and knowledge. Logic Journal of the IGPL 9(2), 273–288 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wassermann, R.: Resource bounded belief revision. Erkenntnis 50(2-3), 429–446 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro, S.C., Rapaport, W.J.: The SNePS family. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(2-5), 243–275 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Martins, J., Shapiro, S.C.: A model for belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 35(1), 25–79 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bacchus, F., Halpern, J., Levesque, H.: Reasoning about noisy sensors and effectors in the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence 111(1-2), 171–208 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ismail, H.O.: A reason maintenance perspective on relevant Ramsey conditionals. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18(4), 508–529 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, F.L., Shapiro, S.C.: Dependency-directed reconsideration: Belief base optimization for truth maintenance systems. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), pp. 313–320 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Demolombe, R., Jones, A.J.I.: Reasoning about topics: Towards a formal theory. In: Workshop on Formalizing contexts: Papers from the 1995, AAAI Fall Symposium, Technical Report FS-95-02, Boston, 55–59 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amir, E., McIlraith, S.: Partition-based logical reasoning for first-order and propositional theories. Artificial Intelligence 162(1-2), 49–88 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ismail, H.O., Kasrin, N. (2010). Focused Belief Revision as a Model of Fallible Relevance-Sensitive Perception. In: Dillmann, R., Beyerer, J., Hanebeck, U.D., Schultz, T. (eds) KI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16111-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16111-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16110-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16111-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics