Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 323))

  • 1002 Accesses

Abstract

The quest to define human intelligence has led researchers down a large range of paths. One such path has been the search for a single, basic psychometric measure that can be used to account for a large portion of the variance in human mental ability. Inspection Time (IT) has emerged at the forefront of these efforts and can be shown to account for approximately 25% of the variance in psychometric tests of intelligence (e.g., IQ). In this study, we attempt to gain an insight into the nature of IT as a psychometric measure by first contrasting individuals that are adept at performing the IT task (those with low ITs) with individuals that are not (those with high ITs) using oculomotor and task-performance measures recorded during two visual tasks. The results of the first experiment show that the current prevailing theory regarding IT, the integration theory, is incapable of accounting for the results found during the visual tasks. This leads us to introduce a novel theory of IT, the watered-tree theory, which places IT as a measure of information propagation. We then perform a second experiment to test the opposing predictions of the integration theory and the watered-tree theory and find that the results are in line with the predictions of the watered-tree theory. A discussion is presented on the implications of the proposed theory and the need for its future validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Galton, F.: Inquiries into Human Faculty. Macmillan, London (1883)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hick, W.E.: On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 79, 349–360 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sternberg, S.: High speed scanning in human memory. Science 153, 652–654 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brody, N.: Intelligence, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Detterman, D.K.: What does reaction time tell us about intelligence? In: Vernon, P.A. (ed.) Speed of information-processing and intelligence, pp. 177–200. Ablex, Norwood (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vickers, D., Nettelbeck, T., Wilson, R.J.: Perceptual indices of performance: The measurement of ‘inspection time’ and ‘noise’ in the visual system. Perception 1, 263–295 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nettelbeck, T.: Correlation between inspection time and psychometric abilities: A personal interpretation. Intelligence 29, 459–474 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nettelbeck, T., Lally, M.: Inspection time and measured intelligence. British Journal of Psychology 67, 17–22 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nettelbeck, T., Cheshire, F., Lally, M.: Intelligence, work performance and inspection time. Ergonomist 22, 291–297 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vickers, D., Smith, P.: The rationale for the inspection time index. Personality and Individual Differences 7, 609–624 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deary, I.J.: Inspection time and WAIS-R IQ subtypes: a confirmatory factor analysis study. Intelligence 17, 223–236 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stough, C., Brebner, J., Nettelbeck, T., Cooper, C.J., Bates, T., Mangan, G.L.: The relationship between intelligence, personality and inspection time. British Journal of Psychology 87, 255–268 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burns, N.R., Nettelbeck, T.: Inspection time in the structure of cognitive abilities. Intelligence 31, 237–255 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grudnik, J.L., Kranzler, J.H.: Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time. Intelligence 29, 523–535 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kranzler, J.H., Jensen, A.R.: Inspection time and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 13, 329–347 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nettelbeck, T.: Inspection time and intelligence. In: Vernon, P.A. (ed.) Speed of Information Processing and Intelligence, pp. 295–346. Ablex, Norwood (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brand, C.R., Deary, I.J.: Intelligence and ‘inspection time’. In: Eysenck, H.J. (ed.) A model for intelligence, pp. 133–148. Springer, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deary, I.J., Stough, C.: Intelligence and Inspection Time Achievements, Prospects, and Problems. American Psychologist 51, 599–608 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deary, I.J.: Human intelligence differences: toward a combined experimental-differential approach. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 5, 164–170 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. White, M.: The inspection time rationale fails to demonstrate that inspection time is a measure of the speed of post-sensory processing. Personality and Individual Differences 15, 185–198 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knibb, K.: A dynamic mask for inspection time. Personality and Individual Differences 13, 237–248 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans, G., Nettelbeck, T.: Inspection time: a flash mask to reduce apparent movement effects. Personality and Individual Differences 15, 91–94 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. White, M.: Interpreting inspection time as a measure of the speed of sensory processing. Personal and Individual Differences 20, 351–363 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burns, N.R., Nettelbeck, T., White, M.: Testing the interpretation of inspection time as a measure of speed of sensory processing. Personality and Individual Differences 24, 25–39 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Burns, N.R., Nettelbeck, T., Cooper, J.: Inspection time correlates with general speed of processing but not with fluid ability. Intelligence 27, 37–44 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahneman, D., Beatty, J.: Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583–1585 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahneman, D., Beatty, J., Pollack, I.: Perceptual deficit during a mental task. Science 157, 218–219 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beatty, J.: Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 276–292 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rayner, K.: Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin 124, 372–422 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Treisman, A., Gelade, G.: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolfe, J.M.: Visual Search. In: Pashler, H. (ed.) Attention, Hove, England UK, pp. 13–71 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pomplun, M., Sichelschmidt, L., Wagner, K., Clermont, T., Rickheit, G., Ritter, H.: Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science 25, 3–36 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Inamdar, S., Pomplun, M.: Comparative Search Reveals the Tradeoff between Eye Movements and Working Memory Use in Visual Tasks. In: Alterman, R., Kirsh, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, pp. 599–604 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vernon, P.A., Mori, M.: Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence 16, 273–288 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reed, T.E., Jensen, A.R.: Arm nerve conduction velocity (NCV), brain NCV, reaction time, and intelligence. Intelligence 15, 33–47 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Deary, I.J., Caryl, P.G.: Neuroscience and human intelligence differences. Trends in neuroscience 20, 365–371 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garlick, D.: Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychological Review 109, 116–136 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hunt, J.M.: Intelligence and Experience. Ronald Press Company, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gregory, R.L.: Seeing after blindness. Nature Neuroscience 6, 909–910 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. von Senden, M.: Space and Sight: The Perception of Space and Shape in the Congenitally Blind Before and After Operation. Methuen, London (1932)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garaas, T.W., Pomplun, M. (2010). The Visual Implications of Inspection Time. In: Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Kinsner, W. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 323. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16083-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16083-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16082-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16083-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics