Advertisement

Impact of Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technology on the Validity of the Construct Information Literacy in Higher Education

  • A. A. J. (Jos) van Helvoort
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 96)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is a reflective discussion on the validity of the construct Information Literacy in the perspective of changing information and communication technologies. The research question that will be answered is: what is the impact of technological developments on the relevance of the Information Literacy concept? Technological developments that will be discussed are:

- content integration (federated search engines)

- amateur publishing (user generated content)

- use of social networks to find information

- personalisation and push technology

- loss of context / fragmentation of information.

Research methods: desk research and critical analysis of the results that were found. The analysis of the influence of the discussed technologies on the Information Literacy concept is represented by arrow diagrams.

Findings: The Information Literacy concept refers to a set of sub skills varying from retrieval skills to critical use of scholarly information. Changing technologies reduce the significance of the more instrumental sub skills of the Information Literacy concept. On the other hand, higher order cognitive skills (for instance critical evaluation of resources and analysis of content) become more and more important for students and professionals who try to solve their information problems.

The paper concludes with a description of the facets of the Information Literacy concept that need extra attention in the education of the knowledge workers of the future.

Keywords

Information technology communication technology information literacy higher education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Godwin, P.: Making Life Easier for Academics: How Librarians can Help Staff Weather the Technological Storm. Journal of eLiteracy 2, 68–79 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boekhorst, A.: Informatievaardig Worden in Het Onderwijs, Een Informatiewetenschappelijk Perspectief: Een Vergelijkende Gevallenstudie in Nederland en Zuid-Afrika. University of Pretoria, Pretoria (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webber, S., Johnston, B.: Conceptions of Information Literacy: New Perspectives and Implications. Journal of Information Science 26, 381–397 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marton, F.: Phenomenography—Describing Conceptions of the World Around us. Instructional Science 10, 177–200 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce, C.: The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Auslib Press, Adelaide (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruce, C.: The Phenomenon of Information Literacy. Higher Education Research & Development 17, 25–43 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berkowitz, R., Eisenberg, M.: Information Problem-Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Pub. Corp., Norwood (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maybee, C.: Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Use: The Basis for Creating User-Centered Student Information Literacy Instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, 79–85 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergman, M.: The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value. Journal of Electronic Publishing 7 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Devine, J., Egger-Sider, F.: Going Beyond Google: The Invisible Web in Learning and Teaching. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godwin, P.: Information Literacy in the Age of Amateurs: How Google and Web 2.0 Affect Librarians’ Support of Information Literacy, http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/italics/vol5iss4/godwin.pdf
  12. 12.
    Morville, P.: Ambient Findability. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keen, A.: The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture. Doubleday, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R.: The 2009 Horizon Report. The New Media Consortium, Austin (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Windham, C.: Getting Past Google: Perspectives on Information Literacy from the Millennial Mind. [S.L.], Educause, http://connect.educause.edu/Library/ELI/GettingPastGooglePerspect/39341?time=1208003180
  16. 16.
    Bates, M.: The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface. Online Review 13, 407–424 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carroll, J.: Expert Internet Information Access. Journal of Educational Computing Research 20, 209–222 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mijnsbergen, E.: Het Nieuwe Zoeken Heet Vragen, http://www.zbdigitaal.nl/2009/10/het-nieuwe-zoeken-heet-vragen.html
  19. 19.
    Research Information Network: Researchers and Discovery Services: Behaviour, Perceptions, Needs, http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-accessing-information-resources/researchers-and-discovery-services-behaviour-perc
  20. 20.
    Garb, R.: More Transparency in Customized Search Results, http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/more-transparency-in-customized-search.html
  21. 21.
    Arias, M., Cantera, J., Vegas, J.: Context-based Personalization for Mobile Web Search. In: VLDB, Auckland (New Zealand), http://persdb08.stanford.edu/5-PersDB-Paper.pdf
  22. 22.
    Carmel, D., et al.: Personalized Social Search Based on the User’s Social Network. In: Proceeding of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Hong Kong, China, November 2-6 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tuominen, K.: Information Literacy 2.0. Signum 5, 6–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siemens, G., Tittenberger, P.: Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning. University of Manitoba, Manitoba, http://techcommittee.wikis.msad52.org/file/view/HETL.pdf
  25. 25.
    Weinberger, D.: Everything is Miscellaneous. Henry Holt and Company, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dochy, F., McDowell, L.: Assessment as a Tool for Learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23, 279–298 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., Vermetten, Y.: Information Problem Solving by Experts and Novices: Analysis of a Complex Cognitive Skill. Computers in Human Behavior 21, 487–508 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. J. (Jos) van Helvoort
    • 1
  1. 1.Academy of ICT&MediaThe Hague University of Applied SciencesThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations