An Evaluation of TS13298 in the Scope of MoReq2

  • Gülten Alır
  • Thomas Sødring
  • İrem Soydal
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 96)


TS13298 is the first Turkish standard developed for electronic records management. It was published in 2007 and is particularly important when developing e-government services. MoReq2, which was published in 2008 as an initiative of the European Union countries, is an international “de facto” standard within the field of electronic records management. This paper compares and evaluates the content and presentation of the TS13298 and MoReq2 standards, and similarities and differences between the two standards are described. Moreover, the question of how MoReq2 can be used as a reference when updating TS13298 is also dealt with. The method of hermeneutics is used for the evaluation, and the texts of TS13298 and MoReq2 were compared and reviewed. These texts were evaluated in terms of terminology, access control and security, retention and disposition, capture and declaring, search, retrieval, presentation and metadata scheme. We discovered that TS13298 and MoReq2 have some “requirements” in common. However, the MoReq2 requirements, particularly in terms of control and security, retention and disposition, capture and declaration, search and presentation, are both vaster and more detailed than those of TS13298. As a conclusion it is emphasized that it would be convenient to update TS13298 by considering these requirements. Moreover, it would be useful to update and improve TS13298 by evaluating MoReq2 in terms of terminology and metadata scheme.


TS13298 MoReq2 electronic records management standards 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Public Record Office: E-government Policy Framework for Electronic Records Management (2001),
  3. 3.
    Screene, L.: How Prepared are Public Bodies for the Implementation of the UK Freedom of Information ACT. Records Management Journal 15, 34–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wamukoya, J.: Records and Archives as a Basis for Good Government: Implications and Challenges for Records Managers and Archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal 10, 23–33 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kampffmeyer, U.: Records Management & MoReq (2009),
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    MoReq: Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (2001),
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Stephens, D.O.: International Standards and Best Practices in RIM. Information Management Journal (2000),
  10. 10.
    Pember, M.: Sorting Out the Standards: What Every Records and Information Professional Should Know. Records Management Journal 16, 21–33 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ARMA: ARMA International (2009),
  12. 12.
    Hofman, H.: Developments in ISO Standards for Recordkeeping. In: DLM Forum Conference (2005),
  13. 13.
    ISO: ISO 15489-1: Information and Documentation – Records Management. International Organization for Standardisation (2001),
  14. 14.
    Brübach, N.: International Standard for Archives and Records Management ISO 15489. In: Proceedings of the DLM-Forum 2002, @ccess and Preservation of Electronic Information: Best Practices and Solutions, Barcelona, May 6-8 (2002), (retrieved December 29, 2009)
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    MoReq2: Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. MoReq2 Specifications. European Commision, Bruxelles-Luxembourg (2008),
  17. 17.
    MoReq2: Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. MoReq2 Specifications. Appendix 9 to the Moreq2 specification: Metadata model. European Commision, Bruxelles-Luxembourg (2008b),
  18. 18.
    NOARK 5: Standard for electronic Archive (2005),
  19. 19.
    DLM Forum: DLM Forum (2009),
  20. 20.
    Garde, J.: Essential MoReq2. DLM Forum Members Meeting. Czech Republic, Prague, April 21-22 (2009),
  21. 21.
    Wilhelm, P.: EDRMS Standards – A Critical Evaluation of The Benefits of Superseding National Standards With European Models Focusing on TNA 2002 Replacement by MoReq2. School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences Northumbria University (2008),
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Wilhelm, P.: An Evaluation of Moreq2 In The Context of National EDRMS Standard Developments in The UK and Europe. Records Management Journal 19, 117–133 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henttonen, P.: A Comparison of MoReq and SÄHKE Metadata and Functional Requirements. Records Management Journal 19, 26–36 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    TS: TS13298 Information and Documentation-Electronic Records Management. Institute of Turkish Standards (2007),
  26. 26.
    Elektronik Belge Standartları Başbakanlık Genelgesi, T.C. Resmi Gazete (26938, 18 Temmuz (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Powell, R.R.: Recent Trends in Research: A Methodological Essay. Library and Information Science Research 21, 91–119 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cole, M., Avison, D.: The Potential of Hermeneutics in Information System Research. European Journal of Information System 16, 820–833 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gülten Alır
    • 1
  • Thomas Sødring
    • 2
  • İrem Soydal
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information ScienceOslo University CollegeOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Information ManagementHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations