Skip to main content

Requirements and Features Clarifying for Eco-Design Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2661 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of requirements of eco-design tools appears regularly in eco-design literature. Helping actors from design teams to structure their practice of eco-design is indeed a key topic in engineering design. So far authors have high-lighted various aspects of these context-related requirements. Our approach, based on actual utilization of existing tools, raises the following question: what is a good eco-design tool? How can it be characterized? Our original contribution is firstly to cluster requirements in two structured categories taking into account process and results on the one hand, cognitive and social aspects of eco-design practice on the other hand. Requirements are tested with experts in academia on four eco-design tools. In order to analyse how requirements match different tools, a specific framework is also created. Objective evaluation by the researcher is combined with subjective perception of experts. First conclusions about assessment of creative outcomes, usability of tools and confidence in results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akermark, A.M. (2005) The crucial role of the designer in EcoDesign, PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of technology – KTH, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fascicule de documentation FD X30-021 SD 2100 (2003) Développement durable – Responsabilité sociétale des entreprises – Guide pour la prise en compte des enjeux du développement durable dans la stratégie et le management de l'entreprise, AFNOR.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Millet, D. (2003) Intégration de L’environnement en Conception – L’entreprise et le Développement Durable. Hermès Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindhal, M. (2005) Engineering designers’ requirements on design for environment methods and tools, PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology – KTH, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lindhal, M. (2006) Engineering designers’ experience of design for environement methods and tools-Requirement definitions from an interview study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14:487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fargnoli, M., Kimura, F. (2006) Sustainable design of modern industrial products. Proceedings of International Conference of Life Cycle Engineering, LCE’06, Leuven, pp. 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A. (2007) Use of DfE methodologies and methods-Major barriers and challenges. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED’07, August 28–31, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vallet, F., Millet, D., Eynard, B. (2009) Investigating the use of eco-design guides: Presentation of two case studies. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED’09, August 24–27, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eder, W.E. (2009) Design engineering and needs for methodology. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED’09, August 24–27, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, E. (2001) Applying structured methods to Eco-innovation. An evaluation of the Product Ideas Tree Diagram. Design Studies, 22:519–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorst, K. (2001) Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22:425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smulders, F.E., Reynen, I.M., Dorst, K. (2009) Modelling co-evolution in design practice. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED’09, August 24–27, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H. (2007) Engineering Design-A Systematic Approach, (3rd Edn.). Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, T., Culley, S., Dekoninck, E. (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29:160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yong, S.K., Sang, W.L., Jung, A.P., Ji, Y.J. (2009) Exercises for cognitive elements of design creativity. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED’09, August 24–27, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank participants on the 4th seminar on Design and EcoDesign gathered in Paris in March 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Vallet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vallet, F., Eynard, B., Millet, D. (2011). Requirements and Features Clarifying for Eco-Design Tools. In: Bernard, A. (eds) Global Product Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15972-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15973-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics