Skip to main content

Integrating Innovations into Vehicle Projects – Towards a Robust “Touch Down” Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Global Product Development

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to identify the levers, the obstacles and potential variables that help to create a more robust process for integrating innovations into vehicle development projects. The ultimate aim of our work is to help to increase the numbers of innovations providing high added value for the customer that are assimilated into future vehicles.The analysis that we present is the result of an in-depth diagnostic study (40 persons consulted, 80 hof interviews), feedback from five vehicle development projects and detailed analysis of three innovation projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Hathchuel, A. (2006) Les Processus D’innovations, Conception Innovante et Croissance des Entreprises. Hermes Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giebel, M., Essmann, H., Du Preez, N., Jochem, R. (2009) Improved innovation trough the integration of quality gates into the entreprise and product lifecycle roadmaps. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing science and Technology, 1(3):199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buet, G., Gidel, T., Millet, T. (2008) New technologies “touch down” process. Proceedings of IDMME – Virtual Concept, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B. (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cusumano, M.A., Nobeaka, K. (1999) Le Management Multi-Projets, Optimiser le Développement de Produits. Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taguchi, G., Clausing, D. (1990) Robust quality. Harward Business Review, (January–February):65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chalupnik, M.J., Wynn, D.C., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J. (2007) Understanding design process robustness: A modelling approach. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jahn, T., Binz, H. (2009) A highly fexible project maturity management method for the early phase of product development, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’09, Standford.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemoigne, J.L. (1990) La Modélisation des Systèmes Complexes. Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gidel, T., Zonghero, W. (2006) Management de Projet, Volume 2 (approfondissements). Hermes Science, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chesbrough, H. (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, T. (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akao, Y. (1990) Quality Function Deployment – Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shiba, S., Graham, A., Walden, D. (1993) A New American TQM – Four practical Revolutions in Management. Productivity Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giard, V., Midler, C. (1993) Pilotages de projet et entreprises. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chvidchenko, I., Chevalier, J. (1997) Conduite et Gestion de Projets. Cédapuès Editions, Toulouse (France).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ullman, D.G. (2001) Robust decision making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1):3–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia, R., Catalone, R. (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminologie: A literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2):110–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Velloso-Rodriguez, K., Truchot, P. (2009) Classification des Projets selon leur but d’origine, Confere’09, N°64, Marrakech, Maroc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Midler, C., Beaume, R. (2010) Project-based learning patterns for dominant design renewal: The case of electric vehicle. International Journal of Project Management 28(2):142–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Buet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buet, G., Gidel, T., Millet, D. (2011). Integrating Innovations into Vehicle Projects – Towards a Robust “Touch Down” Process. In: Bernard, A. (eds) Global Product Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15972-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15973-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics