Skip to main content

SPARQL1.1: New Features and Friends (OWL2, RIF)

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6333))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this tutorial we will give an overview of new features in SPARQL 1.1, which the W3C is currently working on, as well as on the interplay with its ”neighbour standards”, OWL2 and RIF. We will also give a rough overview of existing implementations to play around with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkhateeb, F., Baget, J.-F., Euzenat, J.: Extending sparql with regular expression patterns (for querying rdf). Journal of Web Semantics 7(2), 57–73 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angles, R., Gutierrez, C.: The expressive power of sparql. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckett, D., Berners-Lee, T.: Turtle – Terse RDF Triple Language. W3c team submission, W3C (January 2008), http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/

  4. Boley, H., Hallmark, G., Kifer, M., Paschke, A., Polleres, A., Reynolds, D.: RIF Core Dialect. W3C recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/

  5. Boley, H., Kifer, M.: RIF Basic Logic Dialect. W3C recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-bld/

  6. de Bruijn, J.: RIF RDF and OWL Compatibility. W3C recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl/

  7. Eiter, T., Lutz, C., Ortiz, M., Simkus, M.: Query answering in description logics with transitive roles. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), Pasadena, California, USA, pp. 759–764 (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G.: Recursive aggregates in disjunctive logic programs: Semantics and complexity. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 200–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Unions of conjunctive queries in shoq. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference, KR 2008, Sydney, Australia, pp. 252–262. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (September 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glimm, B., Lutz, C., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Conjunctive query answering for the description logic shiq. J. Artif. Intell. Res (JAIR) 31, 157–204 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Glimm, B., Ogbuji, C., Hawke, S., Herman, I., Parsia, B., Polleres, A., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes. W3C working draft, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/

  12. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer. W3c recommendation, W3C (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/

  13. Ianni, G., Krennwallner, T., Martello, A., Polleres, A.: Dynamic querying of mass-storage rdf data with rule-based entailment regimes. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 310–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jing, Y., Jeong, D., Baik, D.-K.: SPARQL graph pattern rewriting for OWL-DL inference queries. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 20(2), 243–262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: Conjunctive queries for a tractable fragment of owl 1.1. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 310–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C., Calvanese, D., Carroll, J., Giacomo, G.D., Hendler, J., Herman, I., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Ruttenberg, A., Sattler, U., Schneider, M.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles. W3c recommendation, W3C (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/

  17. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of sparql. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 30–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: nsparql: A navigational language for rdf. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of sparql. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 34(3), 45 pages, Article 16 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polleres, A.: From SPARQL to rules (and back). In: Proceedings of the 16th World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2007), Banff, Canada, pp. 787–796. ACM Press, New York (May 2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Polleres, A., Scharffe, F., Schindlauer, R.: SPARQL++ for mapping between RDF vocabularies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 878–896. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3c recommendation, W3C (January 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  23. Schmidt, M., Meier, M., Lausen, G.: Foundations of SPARQL query optimization. In: 13th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2010), Lausanne, Switzerland (March 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seaborne, A., Harris, S.: SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C working draft, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/

  25. Sirin, E., Parsia, B.: SPARQL-DL: SPARQL Query for OWL-DL. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria. CEUR-WS.org (June 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. SQL-99. Information Technology - Database Language SQL- Part 3: Call Level Interface (SQL/CLI). Technical Report INCITS/ISO/IEC 9075-3, INCITS/ISO/IEC, Standard specification (October 1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Polleres, A. (2010). SPARQL1.1: New Features and Friends (OWL2, RIF). In: Hitzler, P., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15917-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15918-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics