Skip to main content

The Impact of Linguistic and Cultural Congruity on Persuasion by Conversational Agents

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6356))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present an empirical study on the impact of linguistic and cultural tailoring of a conversational agent on its ability to change user attitudes. We designed two bilingual (English and Spanish) conversational agents to resemble members of two distinct cultures (Anglo-American and Latino) and conducted the study with participants from the two corresponding populations. Our results show that cultural tailoring and participants’ personality traits have a significant interaction effect on the agent’s persuasiveness and perceived trustworthiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hawkins, R.P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., Dijkstra, A.: Understanding Tailoring in Communicating About Health. Health Educ. Res. 23, 454–466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petty, R., Wegener, D.: Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables. The handbook of social psychology 1, 323–390 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., Blair, W., Jarvis, W.: Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119, 197–253 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luna, D., Peracchio, L., de Juan, M.: The Impact of Language and Congruity on Persuasion in Multicultural E-marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1&2), 41–50 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossen, B., Johnsen, K., Deladisma, A., Lind, S., Lok, B.: Virtual Humans Elicit Skin-Tone Bias Consistent with Real-World Skin-Tone Biases. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 237–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Endrass, B., Rehm, M., André, E.: Culture-Specific Communication Management For Virtual Agents. In: Proc. of 8th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Endrass, B., Andre, E., Huang, L., Gratch, J.: A Data-Driven Approach to Culture-specific Communication Management Styles for Virtual Agents. In: Proc. of 9th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jan, D., Herrera, D., Martinovski, B., Novick, D., Traum, D.: A Computational Model of Culture-Specific Conversational Behavior. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 45–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanbaka, C., Goolkasian, P., Hodges, L.: Can a Virtual Cat Persuade You?: The Role of Gender and Realism in Speaker Persuasiveness. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 1153–1162. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Katagiri, Y., Takahashi, T., Takeuchi, Y.: Social Persuasion in Human-Agent Interaction. In: Second IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, pp. 64–69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schulman, D., Bickmore, T.: Persuading users through counseling dialogue with a conversational agent. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lafferty, J., Eady, P.: The Desert Survival Problem. Experimental Learning Methods (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sue, D., Ivey, A., Pedersen, P.: A Theory of Multicultural Counseling and Therapy. Brooks/Cole Pacific Grove, Calif.(1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albert, R., Ha, A.: Latino/Anglo-American Differences in Attributions to Situations Involving Touch and Silence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 28, 253–280 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wheeless, L., Grotz, J.: The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research 3, 250–257 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dolinski, D., Nawrat, M., Rudak, I.: Dialogue Involvement as a Social Influence Technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 1395 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Pubns, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yin, L., Bickmore, T., Cortés, D.E. (2010). The Impact of Linguistic and Cultural Congruity on Persuasion by Conversational Agents. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6356. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15891-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15892-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics