Abstract
We examine the role of banks in the Schumpeterian innovative evolution. The banks are equipped with a decision making mechanism, selecting innovations to shape the economic development of the whole economy. This process is based on the risk analysis across projects suggested by innovators. To study this problem we expand the static Arrow-Debreu theory of general economic equilibrium by the addition of a system of banks, the role of which is to extend credits and loans to firms and households, respectively, to allow the former to implement innovations. Then, to dynamize our setting, we employ a qualitative theory of dynamical systems, where the basic forms of economic life distinguished by Schumpeter, namely the circular flow and economic development, are modeled by cumulative and innovative extensions of the production system, respectively. In particular, we specify the sufficient conditions to guarantee the preservation of the rules of circular flow of the consumption sphere within the innovative development of the whole economy, which delivers a deeper insight into the intrinsic logic of Schumpeterian evolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aliprantis, C. D., Brown, D. J., & Burkinshaw, O. (1990). Existence and optimality of competitive equilibria. Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
Amable, B., Chatelain, J. B., & Kirsten, R. (2004). Credit rationing, profit accumulation and economic growth. Economics Letters, 85(3), 301â307.
Anderson, E.S. (2008). The essence of Schumpeterâs evolutionary economics: A centennial appraisal of his first book. Paper for the International Schumpeter Society Conference, Rio de Janeiro, 2â5 July 2008.
Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Review No.84 (May), pp. 1â9.
Barreto, H. (1989). The entrepreneur in microeconomic theory. London: Routledge.
Borglin, A. (2004). Economic dynamics and general equilibrium: time and uncertainty. Berlin: Springer.
Boulding, K. (1991). What is evolutionary economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 9â17.
CiaĆowicz, B., Malawski, A. (2007). Credit as a source of innovations â An axiomatic Schumpeterian approach. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business, Management and Economics 2007, Yasar University, Cesme â Izmir, Turkey.
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. New York: Wiley.
Dosi, G., Fabiani, S., Aversi, R., & Meacci, M. (1994). The dynamics of international differentiation: a multi-country evolutionary model. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(3), 225â241.
Duffie, D. (1988). Security markets, stochastic models. Boston, San Diego, London.
Fagerberg, J. (2003). Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 125â159.
Fiaschi, A. (2008). A note about credit rationing on research and development. MPRA Paper No. 12300, posted 29. December 2008; Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12300/.
Foster, J. (2000). Competitive selection, self-organisation and Joseph A Schumpeter. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(3), 311â328.
Gilles, R. P. (1990). Core and equlibria of socially structured economies. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Gorton, G. B., Kahn, J. A. (1993). The design of bank loan contracts, collateral, and renegotiation. NBER Working Paper No. W4273.
Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2006). Principles of neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, 275â289.
Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (Eds.). (2007a). Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2007b). A roadmap to comprehensive neo-Schumpeterian economics. In Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics (pp. 1160â1170). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., MPG Books Ltd., Bodmin, Cornwall.
Hildenbrand, W. (1974). Core and equlibria of a large economy. Princeton, New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (1993). Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magill, M., & Quinzii, M. (2002). The theory of incomplete markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Malawski, A. (1999). Metoda aksjomatyczna w ekonomii. WrocĆaw: Ossolineum.
Malawski, A. (2004). Beyond Schumpeterian illusions: From general equilibrium to evolutionary economics. The paper presented at the International Schumpeter Society Meeting, Milan, 9â11 June 2004, Italy.
Malawski, A. (2005). A dynamical system approach to the Arrow-Debreu theory of general equilibrium. The 9th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings 2005, Orlando, Florida, USA, Vol. VII, pp. 434â439.
Malawski, A. (2008). Distributive justice and Schumpeterian innovative evolution â an axiomatic approach in the context of social cohesion. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Quality of Life Improvement through Social Cohesion, W. Ostasiewicz ed., WrocĆaw University of Economics, WrocĆaw 2008, pp. 80â98.
Malawski, A., Woerter, M. (2006). Diversity structure of the Schumpeterian evolution. An axiomatic approach. Arbeitspapiere/Working papers of the Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research, No 153, Oct. 2006, Zurich.
Malerba, F., Cantner, U. (Eds.). (2007). Innovation, industrial dynamics and structural transformation: Schumpeterian legacies. Berlin: Springer.
MĂ€rz, E. (1991). Joseph Schumpeter: Scholar, teacher and politician. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayer, T. (1993). Truth versus precision in economics. Aldershot and Brokfield: Edward Elgar Publ. Ltd.
Messori, M. (2004). Credit and money in Schumpeterâs theory. In R. Arena (Ed.), Money, credit and role of the state. Aldershot, Ashgate, (pp. 173â198).
Nelson, R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 48â90.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap.
Pang, S., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., & Li, R. (2002). Credit-risk decision model and credit rationing with asymmetry information. American Control Conference, 1(Issue), 370â375.
Perlman, M. (2007). Schumpeterâs views on methodology: Their source and their evolution. In Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 27â54.
Saviotti, P. P., & Metcalfe, J. S. (1991). Evolutionary theories of economic and technological change. Chur, philadelfia, harwood, Switzerland: Academic Publishers.
Saviotti, P. P., & Pyka, A. (2004). Economic development by the creation of new sector. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(1), 1â35.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). Die theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. English translations: The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1934 and A Galaxy Book, New York: Oxford University Press 1961.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.) First published in German, 1912.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. 3th enlarged edn. New York: Harper.
Sybirskij, K. S., Schube, A. S. (1987). Semidynamical systems (topological theory); in Russian, Sztinca, KiszyniĂłw.
Silverberg, G., Verspagen, B. (2002). A percolation model of innovation in complex technology spaces. MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum.
Stiglitz, E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393â410.
Weintraub, E. R. (1985). General equilibrium analysis: studies in appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
CiaĆowicz, B., Malawski, A. (2011). The Role of Banks in the Schumpeterian Innovative Evolution: An Axiomatic Set-up. In: Pyka, A., Derengowski Fonseca, M. (eds) Catching Up, Spillovers and Innovation Networks in a Schumpeterian Perspective. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15886-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15886-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15885-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15886-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)