Skip to main content

Experimental Comparison of Methods to Handle Boundary Constraints in Differential Evolution

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI (PPSN 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6239))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we show that the technique of handling boundary constraints has a significant influence on the efficiency of the Differential Evolution method. We study the effects of applying several such techniques taken from the literature. The comparison is based on experiments performed for a standard DE/rand/1/bin strategy using the CEC2005 benchmark. The paper reports the results of experiments and provides their simple statistical analysis. Among several constraint handling methods, a winning approach is to repeat the differential mutation by resampling the population until a feasible mutant is obtained. Coupling the aforementioned method with a simple DE/rand/1/bin strategy allows to achieve results that outperform in many cases results of almost all other methods tested during the CEC2005 competition, including the original DE/rand/1/bin strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Price, K., et al.: Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Neri, F., Tirronen, V.: Recent advances in Differential Evolution: a survey and experimental analysis. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 33(1-2), 61–106 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin, A.K., et al.: Differential Evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 13(2), 398–417 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, J., Lampinen, J.: A Fuzzy Adaptive Differential Evolution algorithm. Soft Computing 9(6), 448–462 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, J., Sanderson, A.C.: JADE: adaptive Differential Evolution with optional external archive. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 13(5), 945–958 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doumpos, M., et al.: An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method. Eur. J. of Operational Research 199(2), 496–505 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Rönkkönen, J., et al.: Real-parameter optimization with differential evolution. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brest, J., et al.: Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 10(6), 646–657 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karabogal, N., Cetinkayal, B.: Design of digital FIR filters using Differential Evolution algorithm. Circuits, Systems, Signal Processing 25(5), 649–660 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, N.: Compilation of results on the 2005 CEC benchmark function set (2005), http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/epnsugan/index_files/CEC-05/compareresults.pdf

  11. Suganthan, P.N., et al.: Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2005 special session on real-parameter optimization. Technical report, Nanyang Tech. Univ. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bui, L.T., et al.: Comparing two versions of differential evolution in real parameter optimization. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Qin, A., Suganthan, P.: Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm for numerical optimization. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martines, C.G., Lozano, M.: Hybrid real-coded genetic algorithms with female and male differentiation. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Molina, D., et al.: Adaptive local search parameters for real-coded memetic algorithms. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ballester, P., et al.: Real-parameter optimization performance study on the CEC-2005 benchmark with SPC-PNX. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sinha, A., et al.: A population-based, steady-state procedure for real-parameter optimization. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Posik, P.: Real parameter optimization using mutation step co-evolution. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liang, J., Suganthan, P.: Dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimizer with local search. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan, B., Gallagher, M.: Experimental results for the special session on real-parameter optimization at CEC 2005: A simple, continuous EDA. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Auger, A., et al.: A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Auger, A., et al.: Performance evaluation of an advanced local search evolutionary algorithm. In: CEC 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arabas, J., Szczepankiewicz, A., Wroniak, T. (2010). Experimental Comparison of Methods to Handle Boundary Constraints in Differential Evolution. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. PPSN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15870-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15871-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics