Skip to main content

Improved Dynamic Lexicographic Ordering for Multi-Objective Optimisation

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI (PPSN 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6239))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1953 Accesses

Abstract

There is a variety of methods for ranking objectives in multi-objective optimization and some are difficult to define because they require information a priori (e.g. establishing weights in a weighted approach or setting the ordering in a lexicographic approach). In many-objective optimization problems, those methods may exhibit poor diversification and intensification performance. We propose the Dynamic Lexicographic Approach (DLA). In this ranking method, the priorities are not fixed, but they change throughout the search process. As a result, the search process is less liable to get stuck in local optima and therefore, DLA offers a wider exploration in the objective space. In this work, DLA is compared to Pareto dominance and lexicographic ordering as ranking methods within a Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm tackling the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks, A., Vincent, J., Anyakoha, C.: A review of particle swarm optimization. part II: hybridisation, combinatorial, multicriteria and constrained optimization, and indicative applications. Natural Computing 7(1), 109–124 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Castro-Gutierrez, J., Landa-Silva, D., Moreno Perez, J.: Dynamic lexicographic approach for heuristic multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Metaheuristics for Logistic Planning (CAEPIA-TTIA 2009) (Seville (Spain)), pp. 153–163 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coello, C., Lamont, G., Veldhuizen, D.: Evolutionary algorithms for solving Multi-Objective problems. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Consoli, S., Moreno-Pérez, J.A., Darby-Dowman, K., Mladenović, N.: Discrete particle swarm optimization for the minimum labelling steiner tree problem. Natural Computing 9(1), 29–46 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dantzig, G., Ramser, J.: The truck dispatching problem. Management Science 6(1), 80–91 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dorronsoro Díaz, B.: VRP web (2009), http://neo.lcc.uma.es/radi-aeb/WebVRP/

  7. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X.: Multiple criteria optimization: State of the art annotated bibliographic survey. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. (52) Springer/Kluwer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks - Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kokolo, I., Hajime, K., Shigenobu, K.: Failure of pareto-based MOEAs, does non-dominated really mean near to optimal? In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2001), pp. 957–962. IEEE press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laporte, G., Golden, B., Grazia, M., Melissa, A.: The vehicle routing problem: Latest advances and new challenges. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 43. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zitzler, E., Brockhoff, D., Thiele, L.: The hypervolume indicator revisited: On the design of pareto-compliant indicators via weighted integration. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 862–876. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castro-Gutierrez, J., Landa-Silva, D., Pérez, J.M. (2010). Improved Dynamic Lexicographic Ordering for Multi-Objective Optimisation. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. PPSN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15870-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15871-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics