Skip to main content

PRAM Optimization Using an Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6344))

Abstract

PRAM (Post Randomization Method) was introduced in 1997 but it is still one of the least used methods in statistical categorical data protection. This fact is because of the difficulty to obtain a good transition matrix in order to obtain a good protection. In this paper, we describe how to obtain a better protection using an evolutionary algorithm with integrated information loss and disclosure risk measures to find the best matrix. We also provide experiments using a real dataset of 1000 records in order to empirically evaluate the application of this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caruana, R.A., Schaffer, J.D.: Representation and hidden bias: Gray vs binary coding for genetic algorithms. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 153–161. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Wolf, P.P., Van Gelder, I.: An empirical evaluation of PRAM. Discussion paper 04012. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fienberg, S.E.: Conflict between the needs for access to statistical information and demands for confidentiality. Journal of Official Statistics 10(2), 115–132 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gouweleeuw, J., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L., de Wolf, P.P.: Post randomization for statistical disclosure control: Theory and implementation. Journal of Official Statistics 14(4), 463–478 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Wolf, P.P., Gouweleeuw, J., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L.: Reflections on pram. In: Statistical Data Protection, pp. 337–349. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L., Gouweleeuw, J.: A method for disclosure limitation of microdata. Research paper 9705, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Samarati, P.: Protecting respondents’ identities in microdata release. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 13(6), 1010–1027 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Torra, V.: A quantitative comparison of disclosure control methods for microdata. In: Doyle, P., Lane, J.I., Theeuwes, J.J.M., Zayatz, L.V. (eds.) Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies, ch. 6, pp. 111–133. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marés, J., Torra, V. (2010). PRAM Optimization Using an Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Magkos, E. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6344. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15838-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15838-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15837-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15838-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics