Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finite-Difference Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion

Abstract

The finite-difference method can be considered the classical and most frequently applied method for the numerical simulation of seismic wave propagation. It is based on the approximation of an exact derivative ∂x f (x i) at a grid position x i in terms of the function f evaluated at a finite number of neighbouring grid points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford, R. M., Kelly, K. R., Boore, D. M.: Accuracy of finite difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation. Geophysics 39, 834–842 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, Z., Karal, F. C.: Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite-difference methods. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 367–398 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen, T.: Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference modelling. Comput. Geosci. 28, 887–899 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M.: Love waves in nonuniform waveguides: finite difference calculations. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1512–1527 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J., Frjørtoft, R., von Neumann, J.: Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus 2, 237–254 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. B.: A nearly exact second-order finite-difference time-domain wave propagation algorithm on a coarse grid. Comput. Phys. 8, 730–734 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. B.: High accuracy solution of Maxwell’s equations using nonstandard finite differences. Comput. Phys. 11, 287–292 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., Lewy, H.: Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik. Mathematische Annalen 100, 32–74 (1928)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J., Nicolson, P.: A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of heat conduction type. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 43, 50–67 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dablain, M. A.: The application of high-order differencing to the scalar wave equation. Geophysics 51, 54–66 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., Clayton, R. W.: A finite-difference simulation of wave propagation in two-dimensional random media. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 2167–2186 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., Clayton, R. W.: Finite-difference simulations of seismic scattering: implications for the propagation of short-period seismic waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 6465–6489 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., Vidale, J.: A 3-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara valley, California, from a Loma Prieta aftershock. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 2045–2074 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Furumura, T., Chen, L.: Large-scale parallel simulation and visualisation of 3D seismic wave field using the Earth Simulator. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 6, 153–168 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, R. W.: Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1091–1106 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, G. J.: Arbitrary source and receiver positioning in finite-difference schemes using Kaiser windowed sinc functions. Geophysics 67, 156–166 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holberg, O.: Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large-scale simulation of wave phenomena. Geophys. Prosp. 35, 629–655 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igel, H., Mora, P., Riollet, B.: Anisotropic wave propagation through finite-difference grids. Geophysics 60, 1203–1216 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igel, H., Djikpéssé, H., Tarantola, A.: Waveform inversion of marine reflection seismograms for P impedance and Poisson’s ratio. Geophys. J. Int. 124(2), 363–371 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igel, H., Nissen-Meyer, T., Jahnke, G.: Wave propagation in 3D spherical sections. Effects of subduction zones. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 132, 219–234 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, C.-H., Shin, C., Suh, J. H.: An optimal 9-point, finite-difference, frequency-space 2-D scalar wave extrapolator. Geophysics 61, 529–537 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. R., Ward, R. W., Treitel, S., Alford, R. M.: Synthetic seismograms: a finite-difference approach. Geophysics 41, 2–27 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, B. L. N., Furumura, T.: Stochastic waveguide in the lithosphere: Indonesian subduction zone to Australian craton. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 363–382 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristek, J., Moczo, P., Archuleta, R. J.: Efficient methods to simulate planar free surface in the 3D 4th-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 46, 355–381 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristekova, M., Kristek, J., Moczo, P., Day, S. M.: Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 1836–1850 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristekova, M., Kristek, J., Moczo, P.: Time-frequency misfit and goodness-of-fit criteria for quantitative comparison of time signals. Geophys. J. Int. 178, 813–825 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levander, A. R.: Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53, 1425–1436 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, R.: Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 163–182 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Bystrický, Kristek, J., Carcione, J. M., Bouchon, M.: Hybrid modeling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous viscoelastic topographic structures. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 1305–1323 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Halada, L.: 3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes: stability and grid dispersion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 587–603 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Vavrycuk, V., Archuleta, R. J., Halada, J.: 3D heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 3042–3066 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Gális, M.: Simulation of the planar free surface with near-surface lateral discontinuities in the finite-difference modeling of seismic motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 760–768 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Galis, M., Pazak, P., Balazovjech, M.: The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion. Acta Phys. Slovaca 57(2), 177–406 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Galis, M., Pazak, P.: On accuracy of the finite-difference and finite-element schemes with respect to P-wave to S-wave speed ratio. Geophys. J. Int. 182, 493–510 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, P.: Elastic finite differences with convolutional operators. Stanford Explor. Proj. Rep. 48, 277–289 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, F., Dellinger, J., Etgen, J., Nichols, D.: Modeling elastic fields across irregular boundaries. Geophysics 57, 1189–1193 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohminato, T., Chouet, B.: A free-surface boundary condition for including 3D topography in the finite-difference method. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 494–515 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, R. G.: Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics 64, 888–901 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertsson, J. O. A., Blanch, J. O., Symes, W. W.: Viscoelastic finite-difference modeling. Geophysics 59(9), 1444–1456 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertsson, J. O. A.: A numerical free-surface condition for elastic/visco-elastic finite-difference modeling in the presence of topography. Geophysics 61, 1921–1934 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virieux, J.: SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 49, 1933–1957 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virieux, J.: P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 51, 889–901 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. J., Igel, H., Gallovic, F., Cochard, A., Ewald, M.: Source-related variations of ground motions in 3D media: application to the Newport-Inglewood fault, Los Angeles basin. Geophys. J. Int. 175, 202–214 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahradník, J., Urban, L.: Effect of a simple mountain range on underground seismic motion. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 79, 167–183 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahradník, J., Moczo, P., Hron, F.: Testing four elastic finite difference schemes for behaviour at discontinuities. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 83, 107–129 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleibinhaus, F., Hole, J. A., Ryberg, T., Fuis, G. S.: Structure of the California Coast Ranges and San Andreas Fault at SAFOD from seismic waveform inversion and reflection imaging. J. Geophys. Res. 112, doi:10.1029/2006JB004611 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D. M.: Finite-difference methods for seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous materials. In: Methods in Computational Physics, vol. 11, Academic Press, New York, NY (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessa, J. X., Operto, S., Kodaira, S., Nakanishi, A., Pascal, G., Virieux, J., Kaneda, Y.: Multiscale seismic imaging of the eastern Nankai trough by full waveform inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi:10.1029/2004GL020453 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen-Meyer, T.: Numerical simulation of 3D seismic wave propagation through subduction zones. Diploma Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584, Utrecht, CE, The Netherlands

    Andreas Fichtner

Authors
  1. Andreas Fichtner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Fichtner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fichtner, A. (2011). Finite-Difference Methods. In: Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion. Advances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15807-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation