Skip to main content

Agent-Based Simulation for Evaluating Flexible and Agile Business Processes: Separating Knowledge Rules, Process Rules and Information Resources

  • Conference paper
Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation (EOMAS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 63))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In today’s ever changing environment organizations need flexibility and agility to be able to deal with changes. Flexibility is necessary to adapt to changes in their environment, whilst agility is needed to rapidly response to changing customer demands. In this paper a mechanism based on the separation of knowledge rules, process rules and information resources is proposed to enhance the flexibility and agility of business processes. Agent-based simulation is employed to test and evaluate if the necessary flexibility and agility can be created using these mechanisms. In the agent-based simulation the clients and organization entities are simulated, whilst the separation of knowledge rules, process rules and information sources is implemented. Three changes have been evaluated using the simulation. Flexibility and agility proved to be dependent on good system design based on the separation of knowledge rules, process rules and information sources, as well as on the human resources and capabilities executing tasks. Agent-based simulation proved to be a suitable tool for evaluating the level of flexibility and agility prior to real implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gong, Y., Janssen, M., Overbeek, S.J., Zuurmond, A.: Enabling flexible processes by ECA orchestration architecture. In: Janowski, T., Davies, D. (eds.) The 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2009), pp. 19–26. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., Sheth, A.: An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases 3, 119–153 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, L., Zhao, X.: Enhancing competitive edge through knowledge management in implementing ERP systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23, 129–140 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGaughey, R.E.: Internet thechnology: contributing to agility in the twenty-first ecntury. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 1, 7–13 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wadhwa, S., Rao, K.S.: Flexibility and agility for enterprise synchronization: knowledge and Innovation Management Towards Flexagility. Studies in Information and Control 12, 111–128 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Declarative Approach for Flexible Business Processes Management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinl, P., Horn, S., Jablonski, S., Neeb, J., Stein, K., Teschke, M.: A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems. In: The International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, pp. 79–88. ACM, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Janssen, M., Verbraeck, A.: An Agent-based Simulation Testbed for Evaluating Internet-based Matching Mechanisms. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 13,, 371–388 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, J.: An Agent-based Simulation Study for Exploring Organizational Adaptation. Simulation 85, 397–413 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alter, M.J.: Science of flexibility. Human Kinetics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carlsson, B.: Flexibility and the theory of the firm. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 179–203 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gosain, S., Malhotra, A., Sawy, O.A.E.: Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains. Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 7–45 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, C., Sia, S.K.: Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7, 179–206 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernardes, E.S., Hanna, M.D.: A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29, 30–53 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, A., Motwani, J.: A methodology for assessing time-based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15, 36–53 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vokurka, R.J., Fliedner, G.: The journey toward agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems 98, 165–171 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunasekaran, A.: Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 87–105 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meredith, S., Francis, D.: Journey towards agility: the agile wheel explored. The TQM Magazine 12, 137–143 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bieberstein, N., Laird, R.G., Jones, K., Mitra, T.: Executing SOA: A Practical Guide for the Service-Oriented Architect. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In: ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 281–288. ACM, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faget, J., Marin, M., Patrick, M., Owens, V.J., Tarin, L.-O.: Business Processes and Business Rules: Business Agility Becomes Real. Future Strategies Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lienhard, H., Künzi, U.-M.: Workflow and Business Rules: a Common Approach. In: Workflow Handbook 2005, pp. 129–140. Future Strategies Inc. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Müller, R., Greiner, U., Rahm, E.: Agent Work: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 51, 223–256 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Mc-Graw Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wetzel, I., Klischewski, R.: Serviceflow beyond workflow? IT support for managing inter-organizational service processes. Information Systems 29, 127–145 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Likert, R.: The human organization: its management and values. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, Z., Belloum, A., De Laat, C., Adriaans, P., Hertzberger, B.: Using Jade agent framework to prototype an e-Science workflow bus. In: The Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid., pp. 655–660. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoo, M.-J., Glardon, R.: Combining JADE and Repast for the Complex Simulation of Enterprise Value-Adding Networks Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IX, pp. 243–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F.: BDI Agent Programming in AgentSpeak Using Jason. In: Toni, F., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3900, pp. 143–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M.: Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. Wiley, Blackwell (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moreira, Á.F., Vieira, R., Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F.: Agent-Oriented Programming with Underlying Ontological Reasoning. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3904, pp. 155–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies. In: 6th OWL Experienced and Directions Workshop, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Chantilly, Virginia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klapiscak, T., Bordini, R.H.: JASDL: A Practical Programming Approach Combining Agent and Semantic Web Technologies. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5397, pp. 91–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. de Maat, E., Winkels, R.: A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 31–39. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hübner, J.F., Bordini, R.H.: Jason Home page (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gong, Y., Janssen, M. (2010). Agent-Based Simulation for Evaluating Flexible and Agile Business Processes: Separating Knowledge Rules, Process Rules and Information Resources. In: Barjis, J. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 63. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15722-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15723-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics