Skip to main content

A Logical Semantics for Description Logic Programs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6341))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a new semantics for Description Logic programs [1] (dl-programs) that combine reasoning about ontologies in description logics with non-monotonic rules interpreted under answer set semantics. Our semantics is equivalent to that of [1], but is more logical in style, being based on the logic QHT of quantified here-and-there that provides a foundation for ordinary logic programs under answer set semantics and removes the need for program reducts. Here we extend the concept of QHT-model to encompass dl-programs. As an application we characterise some logical relations between dl-programs, by mating the idea of QHT-equivalence with the concept of query inseparability taken from description logics.

Partially supported by the MCICINN projects TIN2006-15455, TIN2009-14562-CO5, and CSD2007-00022, as well as by the WWTF project ICT08-020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. In: KR, pp. 141–151. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosati, R.: Dl+log: Tight integration of description logics and disjunctive datalog. In: KR, pp. 68–78. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosati, R.: On the decidability and complexity of integrating ontologies and rules. J. Web Sem. 3(1), 61–73 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosati, R.: Semantic and computational advantages of the safe integration of ontologies and rules. In: Fages, F., Soliman, S. (eds.) PPSWR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3703, pp. 50–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Heymans, S., de Bruijn, J., Predoiu, L., Feier, C., Nieuwenborgh, D.V.: Guarded hybrid knowledge bases. TPLP 8(3), 411–429 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming. In: IJCAI, pp. 90–96 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Quantified equilibrium logic and foundations for answer set programs. In: Garcia de la Banda, M., Pontelli, E. (eds.) ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5366, pp. 546–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce, D.: Equilibrium logic. AMAI 47(1-2), 3–41 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Conservative extensions in the lightweight description logic \(\mathcal{EL}\). In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Conservative extensions in expressive description logics. In: IJCAI, pp. 453–458 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Can you tell the difference between dl-lite ontologies? In: KR, pp. 285–295. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Strongly equivalent logic programs. ACM TOCL 2(4), 526–541 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fink, M.: A general framework for equivalences in answer-set programming by countermodels in the logic of here-and-there. In: TPLP (2010) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fink, M.: Equivalences in answer-set programming by countermodels in the logic of here-and-there. In: Garcia de la Banda, M., Pontelli, E. (eds.) ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5366, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: A characterization of strong equivalence for logic programs with variables. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4483, pp. 188–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G.: Recursive aggregates in disjunctive logic programs: Semantics and complexity. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 200–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Quantified equilibrium logic an the first order logic of here-and-there. Technical Report MA-06-02, Univ. Rey Juan Carlos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Dalen, D.: Logic and Structure, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Heymans, S., Nieuwenborgh, D.V., Vermeir, D.: Open answer set programming with guarded programs. ACM TOCL 9(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A new perspective on stable models. In: IJCAI, pp. 372–379 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: A first order nonmonotonic extension of constructive logic. Studia Logica 80(2-3), 321–346 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web. AIJ 172(12-13), 1495–1539 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Deciding inseparability and conservative extensions in the description logic el. J. Symb. Comput. 45(2), 194–228 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: A logic-based framework for ontology comparison and module extraction in dl-lite (2010) (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fink, M., Pearce, D.: Some equivalence concepts for hybrid theories. In: CAEPIA, Spanish Association for Artifical Intelligence, pp. 327–336 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fink, M., Pearce, D. (2010). A Logical Semantics for Description Logic Programs . In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15674-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15675-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics