Skip to main content

Polar Spaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Points and Lines

Part of the book series: Universitext ((UTX))

  • 1996 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is a complete teachable proof from first principles of the classification of all polar spaces of polar rank at least four. Polar spaces are defined by the well-known “one or all” axiom on points and lines. Each such space is uniquely associated with a non-degenerate polar space whose singular subspaces are projective spaces. If a maximal singular subspace of the latter has finite rank, this number is called the polar rank of the space. The classical objects on the scene are the polar spaces defined by sesquilinear forms and pseudoquadratic forms. The classification of polar spaces of rank at least four proceeds in two steps: (1) showing that a polar space that can be embedded in a projective space must be classical and (2) showing that a non-degenerate polar space of rank at least four is in fact embeddable. The technical results from the end of the preceding chapter are used in both steps, while a homotopy-proof of Tits’ unpublished result that polar spaces of rank at least three are characterized by the cone over a point facilitates the proof (due to Cuypers, Johnson, and Pasini) of (2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.W. Ahrens and G. Szekeres. On a combinatorial generalization of 27 lines associated with a cubic surface. J. Austral. Math. Soc., 10:485–492, 1969.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Barlotti. Un’ estensione del teorema di Segre-Kustaanheimo. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., 10:96–98, 1955.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. R. Brown. Ovoids of PG(3, q), q even, with a conic section. J. Lond. Math. Soc., 62:569–582, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bruck and Erwin Kleinfeld. The structure of alternative division rings. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA., 37:89–90, 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Francis Buekenhout. A characterization of polar spaces. Simon Stevin, 53:3–7, 1979.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Cameron. Combinatorics: Topics, Techniques, Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Cherwitzo. Hyperovals in Desarguesian planes of even order. Ann. Discrete Math., 37:87–94, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Cherwitzo, T. Pentilla, I. Pinneri, and G. Royle. Flocks and ovals. Geom. Dedicata, 60:193–194, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arjeh Cohen. Point-line spaces related to buildings. In F. Buekenhout, editor, Handbook of Incidence Geometry, Chapter 12, pages 647–737. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arheh Cohen and Ernest Shult. Affine polar spaces. Geom. Dedicata, 35:43–76, 1990.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hans Cuypers, Peter Johnson, and Antonio Pasini. On the embeddability of polar spaces. Geom. Dedicata, 44:349–358, 1992.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hans Cuypers, Peter Johnson, and Antonoi Pasini. On the classification of polar spaces. J. Geom., 48:56–62, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Walter Feit and Graham Higman. The nonexistence of certain generalized polygons. J. Algebra, 1:114–131, 1964.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jon Hall and Ernest Shult. Locally cotriangular graphs. Geom. Dedicata, 18:113–187, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall Hall Jr. Affine generalized quadrilaterals. In L. Mirsky, editor, Studies in Pure Mathematics, pages 113–116. Academic Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. G. Higman. Invariant relations, coherent configurations and generalized polygons. Combinatorics, Part 3, Math. Centre Tract., 57:27–43, 1974.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Peter Johnson. Polar spaces of arbitrary rank. Geom. Dedicata, 35:229–250, 1990.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Peter Johnson and Ernest Shult. Local characterizations of polar spaces. Geom. Dedicata, 28:127–151, 1988.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. William Kantor. Generalized quadrangles associated with G2(q). J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A, 29:212–219, 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Muehlherr. A geometric approach to non-embeddable polar spaces of rank 3. Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. Ser. A, 42:577–594, 1990.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. C. M. O’Keefe and T. Pentilla. Ovoids with a pencil of translation ovals. Geom. Dedicata, 62:19–34, 1996.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. C. M. O’Keefe and T. Pentilla. Ovals in translation hyperovals and ovoids. Euro. J. Combin., 18:667–683, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanley Payne. Nonisomorphic generalized quadrangles. J. Algebra, 18:201–212, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Stanley Payne. A garden of generalized quadrangles. Algebras, Groups, Geom., 3:323–354, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stanley Payne and Jef Thas. Finite Generalized Quadrangles. Pitman, Boston, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholas Percsy. On the Buekenhout–Shult theorem on polar spaces. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Ser. B, 41:283–294, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Pickert. Projectiven Ebenen. Springer, Berlin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ernest Shult and Jef Thas. Constructions of polygons from buildings. Proc. London Math. Soc., 71:397–440, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Michio Suzuki. Contributions to the theory of finite groups. In Marshall Hall Jr., editor, 1960 Institute on Finite Groups; Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. IV, pages 107–109. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Tent and H. Van Maldeghem. Split BN-pairs and Moufang polygons, I. Adv. Math., 174:254–265, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Jef Thas. Generalized polygons. In F. Buekenhout, editor, Handbook for Incidence Geometry, Chapter 9, pages 383–431. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jef Thas, Stanley Payne, and Hendrik Van Maldeghem. Half Moufang implies Moufang for generalized quadrangles. Invent. Math., 105:153–156, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. K. Thas. Automorphisms and Combinatorics of Finite Generalized Quadrangles. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ghent, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Tits. Ovoides et groups de Suzuki. Arch. Math., 13:187–198, 1962.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Tits. Buildings of Spherical Type and Finite BN-Pairs, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 386. Springer, Berlin, 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Tits and R. M. Weiss. Moufang Polygons. Springer, Berlin, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Hendrik Van Maldeghem. Generalized Polygons. Birkhauser, Basel, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. F. D. Veldkamp, Polar geometry, I–IV. Indag. Math., 21:512–551, 1959.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest E. Shult .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shult, E.E. (2011). Polar Spaces. In: Points and Lines. Universitext. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15627-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics