Skip to main content

An Approximation Method for Power Indices for Voting Games

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 319))

Summary

The Shapley value and Banzhaf index are two well known indices for measuring the power a player has in a voting game. However, the problem of computing these indices is computationally hard. To overcome this problem, we analyze approximation methods for computing these indices. Although these methods have polynomial time complexity, finding an approximate Shapley value using them is easier than finding an approximate Banzhaf index. We also find the absolute error for the methods and show that this error for the Shapley value is lower than that for the Banzhaf index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausiello, G., Crescenzi, P., Gambosi, G., Kann, V., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Protasi, M.: Complexity and approximation: Combinatorial optimization problems and their approximability properties. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banzhaf, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review 19, 317–343 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bork, P.V., Grote, H., Notz, D., Regler, M.: Data Analysis Techniques in High Energy Physics Experiments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: Complexity of constructing solutions in the core based on synergies among coalitions. Artificial Intelligence Journal 170, 607–619 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, X., Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research 19(2), 257–266 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Elkind, E., Goldberg, L.A., Goldberg, P., Wooldridge, M.: Computational complexity of weighted threshold games. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: A randomized method for the Shapley value for the voting game. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 955–962 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Francis, A.: Advanced Level Statistics. Stanley Thornes Publishers (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mann, I., Shapley, L.S.: Values for large games iv: Evaluating the electoral college by monte carlo techniques. Technical report, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen, G.: Multilinear extensions of games. Management Science 18(5), 64–79 (1972)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad, K., Kelly, J.S.: NP-completeness of some problems concerning voting games. International Journal of Game Theory 19, 1–9 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahwan, T., Jennings, N.R.: An algorithm for distributing coalitional value calculations among cooperating agents. Artificial Intelligence Journal 171, 535–567 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandholm, T., Lesser, V.: Coalitions among computationally bounded agents. Artificial Intelligence Journal 94(1), 99–137 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n person games. In: Roth, A.E. (ed.) The Shapley value, pp. 31–40. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: A kernel-oriented model for coalition-formation in general environments: Implemetation and results. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1996), pp. 131–140 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 101(2), 165–200 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, J.R.: An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zlotkin, G., Rosenschein, J.: Coalition, cryptography, and stability: mechanisms foe coalition formation in task oriented domains. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1994), pp. 432–437 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R. (2010). An Approximation Method for Power Indices for Voting Games. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T., Yamaki, H. (eds) Innovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 319. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15611-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15612-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics