Skip to main content

Non-clausal Encoding of Feature Diagram for Automated Diagnosis

  • Conference paper
Software Product Lines: Going Beyond (SPLC 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6287))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automated support for finding unsatisfiable fragments is desirable to help removing deficiency in inconsistent feature diagrams. In encoding feature diagrams into propositional logic formulas, such a problem reduces to finding unsatisfiable cores. Standard algorithms work on clausal formulas, which looses the structural aspect of feature diagram. In this paper, we propose a new automated method, which employs a boolean constraint propagation algorithm for non-clausal formulas. The method can eliminate the problems in the previous approaches, where translation back and forth is required between feature diagram and clausal formulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batory, D.: Feature Models, Grammars, and Propositional Formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Benavides, D., Segura, S., Ruiz-Cortes, A.: Automated Analysis of Feature Models 20 Years Later: A Literature Review. J. Information Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Nowak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis Feasibility Study. CMU/SEI-90-TR-21 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kroening, D., Strichman, O.: Decision Procedures. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mannion, M.: Using First-Order Logic for Product Line Model Validation. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakajima, S.: Constructing FODA Feature Diagrams with a GUI-based Tool. In: Proc. SEKE 2009, pp. 20–25 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakajima, S.: Semi-Automated Diagnosis of FODA Feature Diagram. In: Proc. SAC 2010, pp. 2191–2197 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. White, J., Benavides, D., Schmidt, D.C., Trinidad, P., Dougherty, B., Ruiz-Cortes, A.: Automated Diagnosis of Feature Model Configurations. J. Software and Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nakajima, S. (2010). Non-clausal Encoding of Feature Diagram for Automated Diagnosis. In: Bosch, J., Lee, J. (eds) Software Product Lines: Going Beyond. SPLC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6287. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15579-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15579-6_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15578-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15579-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics