Skip to main content

Evaluation Constructs for Visual Video Summaries

  • Conference paper
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6273))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper reports on a user-centered evaluation of visual video summaries. We evaluated four types of summaries (fastforward, user-controlled fastforward, scene clips and storyboard) with a set of existing performance and satisfaction measures. We further conducted a repertory grid elicitation with our participants gathering evaluation constructs related to both video summary content and controls. Results showed a lack of correlation between performance and satisfaction measures. User-supplied evaluation constructs were shown to span both the performance and satisfaction dimensions of the video summary evaluation space. Most constructs achieved moderate to good inter-rater agreement in a consequent survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christel, M.C.: Evaluation and user studies with respect to video summarization and browsing. In: Multimedia Content Analysis, Management and Retrieval, pp. 196–210 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taskiran, C.M., Pizlo, Z., Amir, A., Ponceleon, D., Delp, E.J.: Automated video program summarization using speech transcripts. IEEE T. Multimedia 8, 775–791 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marchionini, G.: Human performance measures for video retrieval. In: 8th ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp. 307–312 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Truong, B.T., Venkatesh, S.: Video abstraction: A systematic review and classification. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marchionini, G., Song, Y., Farrell, R.: Multimedia surrogates for video gisting: Towards combining spoken words and imagery. Inform. Process. Manag. 45, 615–630 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Over, P., Smeaton, A.F., Kelly, P.: The trecvid 2007 BBC rushes summarization evaluation pilot. In: TRECVID Workshop on Video Summarization, pp. 1–15 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wildemuth, B.M., Marchionini, G., Yang, M., Geisler, G., Wilkens, T., Hughes, A., Gruss, R.: How Fast Is Too Fast? Evaluating Fast Forward Surrogates for Digital Video. In: 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS JCDL, pp. 221–230 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corchs, S., Ciocca, G., Schettini, R.: Video summarization using a neurodynamical model of visual attention. In: IEEE 6th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 71–74 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, Y.-F., Lu, L., Zhang, H.-J., Li, M.: A user attention model for video summarization. In: ACM Multimedia, ACMMM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guironnet, M., Pellerin, D., Guyader, N., Ladret, P.: Video Summarization Based on Camera Motion and a Subjective Evaluation Method. J. Image Video Processing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchionini, G., Wildemuth, B.M., Geisler, G.: The Open Video Digital Library: A Möbius strip of research and practice. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 1629–1643 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y., Narayanan, S., Kuo, C.-C.J.: Movie Content Analysis, Indexing and Skimming via Multimodal Information. In: Rosenfeld, A., Doermann, D., Dementhon, D. (eds.) Video Mining. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, F.B., Hunter, M.G.: The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly 26, 39–57 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., Wilson, R.M.S.: Studies on Information as an Asset II: Repertory Grid. J. Inform. Sci. 29, 419–432 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillon, A., McKnight, C.: Towards a classification of text types: a repertory grid approach. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 33, 623–636 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crudge, S.E., Johnson, F.C.: Using the repertory grid and laddering technique to determine the user’s evaluative model of search engines. J. Doc. 63, 259–280 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, M., Wildemuth, B.M., Marchionini, G., Wilkens, T., Geisler, G., Hughes, A., Gruss, R., Webster, C.: Measures of User Performance in Video Retrieval Research. UNC (SILS) Technical Report TR-2003-02 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, M., Marchionini, G.: Deciphering visual gist and its implications for video retrieval and interface design. In: ACM CHI, pp. 1877–1880 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sundaram, H., Chang, S.-F.: Condensing computable scenes using visual complexity and film syntax analysis. In: IEEE ICME (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Balatsoukas, P., Morris, A., O’Brien, A.: An evaluation framework of user interaction with metadata surrogates. J. Inform. Sci. 35, 321–339 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goodrum, A.: Multidimensional scaling of video surrogates. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52, 174–182 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wildemuth, B.M., Russell, T., Ward, T.J., Marchionini, G., Oh, S.: The Influence of Context and Interactivity on Video Browsing. UNC (SILS) Technical Report TR 2006-01 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Westman, S. (2010). Evaluation Constructs for Visual Video Summaries. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6273. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15464-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15464-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15463-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15464-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics