Skip to main content

The Logical Process of Model-Based Reasoning

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 314))

Abstract

Standard bivalent propositional and predicate logics are described as the theory of correct reasoning. However, the concept of model-based reasoning (MBR) developed by Magnani and Nersessian rejects the limitations of implicit or explicit dependence on abstract propositional, truth-functional logics or their modal variants. In support of this advance toward a coherent framework for reasoning, my paper suggests that complex reasoning processes, especially MBR, involve a novel logic of and in reality. At MBR04, I described a new kind of logical system, grounded in quantum mechanics (now designated as logic in reality; LIR), which postulates a foundational dynamic dualism inherent in energy and accordingly in causal relations throughout nature, including cognitive and social levels of reality. This logic of real phenomena provides a framework for analysis of physical interactions as well as theories, including the relations that constitute MBR, in which both models and reasoning are complex, partly non-linguistic processes. Here, I further delineate the logical aspects of MBR as a real process and the relation between it and its target domains. LIR describes 1) the relation between model theory - models and modeling - and scientific reasoning and theory; and 2) the dynamic, interactive aspects of reasoning, not captured in standard logics. MBR and its critical relations, e.g., between internal and external cognitive phenomena, are thus not “extra-logical” in the LIR interpretation. Several concepts of representations from an LIR standpoint are discussed and the position taken that the concept may be otiose for understanding of mental processes, including MBR. In LIR, one moves essentially from abduction as used by Magnani to explain processes such as scientific conceptual change to a form of inference implied by physical reality and applicable to it. Issues in reasoning involving computational and sociological models are discussed that illustrate the utility of the LIR logical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batterman, R.W.: Idealization and modeling. Synthese 169, 427–446 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bechtel, W.: Mental Mechanisms. Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, M.R., Hacker, P.M.S.: Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Publishing, Massachusetts (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bickhard, M.H.: The interactivist model. Science 166, 547–591 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner, J.E.: A transconsistent logic for model-based reasoning. In: Magnani, L. (ed.) Model Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering. Cognitive Science, Epistemology, Logic. Kings College Publications, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner, J.E.: Logic in Reality. Springer, Dordrecht (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner, J.E.: Prolegomenon to a logic for the information society. Triple-C 7(1), 38–73 (2009), http://www.triple-c.at

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castells, M.: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. In: The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn., vol. I. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carnielli, W.: Logics of formal inconsistency. CLE e-Prints 5(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D’Ottaviano, I.M.L., Hifume, C.: Peircean pragmatic truth and da Costa’s quasi-truth. Studies in Computational Intelligence 64, 383–398 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Advice on abductive logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(2), 189–219 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelfert, A.: Rigorous, results, cross-model justification, and the transfer of empirical warrant: the case of many-body models in physics. Synthese 169, 497–519 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Frigg, R., Hartmann, S.: Models in science. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/models-science/

  14. Hodges, W.: Model Theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/model-theory/

  15. Hofkirchner, W., et al.: ICTs and Society: The Salzburg Approach. University of Salzburg Research Paper No. 3, December. ICT&S Center. Salzburg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horst, S.: The Computational Theory of Mind. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2009), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/computational-mind/

  17. Jacquette, D.: Philosophy of Logic. In: Gabbay, D., Woods, J., Thagard, P. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Series. North-Holland Press (Elsevier), Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolak, D.: Room for a view: On the metaphysical subject of personal identity. Synthese 162, 341–372 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ladyman, J., Ross, D.: Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Leydesdorff, L.: The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leydesdorff, L.: Redundancy in Systems which Entertain a Model of Themselves: Interaction Information and the Self-organization of Anticipation. Preprint for ENTROPY (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lupasco, S.: Logique et Contradiction. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lupasco, S.: Qu’est-ce qu’une structure? Christian Bourgois, Paris (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lupasco, S.: Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie. Editions du Rocher, Paris (1987); Originally published by Éditions Hermann, Paris (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Magnani, L.: Inconsistencies and Creative Abduction in Science. In: AI and Scientific Creativity. Proceedings of the AISB99 Symposium on Scientific Creativity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds.): Model-Based Reasoning. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Magnani, L.: Disembodying minds, externalizing minds. In: Magnani, L., Dossena, R. (eds.) Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. College Publications, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Magnani, L.: Morality in a Technological World. Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Moulines, C.U.: Ontology, reduction, emergence: A general frame. Synthese 151, 313–323 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Priest, G.: In Contradiction. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schlimm, D.: Learning from the existence of models. Synthese 169, 521–538 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Symons, J.: Computational Models of Emergent Properties. Minds and Machines 18, 475–491 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thagard, P.: Computational Philosophy of Science. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thagard, P.: How brains make mental models. In: The Conference on Model-Based Reasoning in Campinas, Brazil (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, E.: Representationalism and the phenomenology of mental imagery. Synthese 160, 397–415 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Benthem, J., et al.: Merging frameworks for interaction. Journal of Philosophical Logic (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brenner, J.E. (2010). The Logical Process of Model-Based Reasoning. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15222-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15223-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics