Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6006))

Abstract

We investigate the prescriptive power of sequential iterated admissibility in coordination games of the Gale-Stewart style, i.e., perfect-information games of infinite duration with only two payoffs. We show that, on this kind of games, the procedure of eliminating weakly dominated strategies is independent of the elimination order and that, under maximal simultaneous elimination, the procedure converges after at most ω many stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time Temporal Logic. J. ACM 49, 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K.R.: Uniform Proofs of Order Independence for Various Strategy Elimination Procedures Contrib. Theoret. Econ. 4(1), article 5 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Battigalli, P.: On Rationalizability in Extensive Games. J. Econ. Theory 74, 40–61 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Berwanger, D.: Admissibility in infinite games. In: Thomas, W., Weil, P. (eds.) STACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 188–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bicchieri, C., Schulte, O.: Common Reasoning About Admissibility. Erkenntnis 45, 299–325 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gale, D., Stewart, F.M.: Infinite Games with Perfect Information Kuhn. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Princeton. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 28, pp. 245–266 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilboa, I., Kalai, E., Zemel, E.: On the Order of Eliminating Dominated Strategies. Oper. Res.  Letters 9, 85–89 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Govindan, S., Wilson, P.: On Forward Induction. Econometrica 77, 1–28 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Grädel, E., Thomas, W., Wilke, T. (eds.): Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games. LNCS, vol. 2500. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Grädel, E., Ummels, M.: Solution Concepts and Algorithms for Infinite Multiplayer Games. In: Apt, K., van Rooij, R. (eds.) New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 4, pp. 151–178. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gretlein, R.J.: Dominance Elimination Procedures on Finite Alternative Games. Int. J. Game Theory 12, 107–113 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Henzinger, T.A.: Games in System Design and Verification. In: van der Meijden, R. (ed.) TARK 2005, pp. 1–4. National University of Singapore (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mailath, G.J., Samuelson, L., Swinkels, J.M.: Extensive Form Reasoning in Normal Form Games. Econometrica 61, 273–302 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Marx, L.: Adaptive Learning and Iterated Weak Dominance. Games Econ. Behav. 26, 254–278 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Marx, L.M., Swinkels, J.M.: Order Ondependence for Iterated Weak Dominance. Games Econ. Behav. 18, 219–245 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohalik, S., Walukiewicz, I.: Distributed games. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds.) FSTTCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2914, pp. 338–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moulin, H.: Dominance Solvability and Cournot Stability. Math. Soc. Sci. 7, 83–102 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Samuelson, L.: Dominated Strategies and Common Knowledge. Games Econ. Behav. 4, 284–313 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berwanger, D. (2010). Infinite Coordination Games. In: Bonanno, G., Löwe, B., van der Hoek, W. (eds) Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory – LOFT 8. LOFT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15164-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15164-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15163-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15164-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics