Skip to main content

Grammar Formalisms for Natural Languages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH,volume 0))

  • 1272 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time there has been a debate about whether CFGs are sufficiently powerful to describe natural languages. Several approaches have used CFGs, oftentimes enriched with some additional mechanism of transformation (Chomsky, 1956) or with features (Gazdar et al., 1985) for natural languages. These approaches were able to treat a large range of linguistic phenomena.

However, in the 1980s Stuart Shieber was able to prove in (1985) that there are natural languages that cannot be generated by a CFG. Before that, Bresnan et al. (1982) made a similar argument but their proof is based on the tree structures obtained with CFGs while Shieber argues on the basis of weak generative capacity, i.e., of the string languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullman, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert. 2002. Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2:113—124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seki, Hiroyuki, Takahashi Matsumura, Mamoru Fujii, and Tadao Kasami. 1991. On multiple context-free grammars. Theoretical Computer Science, 88(2):191–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, Rohit 1966. On context-free languages. Jounal of the ACM, 13:570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony S. 1987. Unbounded dependencies and subjacency in a Tree Adjoining Grammar. In A. Manaster-Ramer, editor, Mathematics of Language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pages 143–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabes, Yves and K.Vijay-Shanker. 1990. Deterministic left to right parsing of tree adjoining languages. In Proceedings of ACL, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, Stuart M. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8:333–343. Reprinted in Savitch:87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boullier, Pierre. 1996. Another facet of LIG parsing. In Proceedings of ACL 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aho, A. V. 1968. Indexed grammars – an extension of context-free grammars. Journal of the ACM, 15(4):647–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, David J. 1988. Characterizing Mildly Context-Sensitive Grammar Formalisms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay-Shanker, K. 1987. A Study of Tree Adjoining Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Asymmetries in long-distance extraction in a Tree Adjoining Grammar. In Baltin and Kroch, editors, Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, Marco. 2007. Dependency Structures and Lexicalized Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Saarland University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert. 1992. Syntactic Locality and Tree Adjoining Grammar: Grammatical, Acquisition and Processing Perspectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald. 1988. Applicability of indexed grammars to natural languages. In Uwe Reyle and Christian Rohrer, editors, Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories. D. Reidel, pages 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joean, Ronald M. Kaplan, Stanley Peters, and Annie Zaenen. 1982. Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(4):613–635. Reprinted in Savitch:87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, Aravind K. 1985. Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky, editors, Natural Language Parsing. Cambridge University Press, pages 206–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzinski, Daniel. 1991. Chinese number-names, tree adjoining languages, and mild context-sensitivity. Computational Linguistics, 17:277–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Kallmeyer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kallmeyer, L. (2010). Grammar Formalisms for Natural Languages. In: Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars. Cognitive Technologies, vol 0. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14846-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14846-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14845-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14846-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics