Abstract
This paper consists of two independent research projects which were carried out through the use of the same questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed by students of the Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace and by students of the School of Pedagogical and Technological Education in Athens. The two groups of respondents were asked to assess on a scale from 1 to 10 the reasons for disagreement among scientists regarding the increase of global temperature as a result of the greenhouse effect. The most important reasons are (1) the interdependence of science and economic activity (mean 7.33 for the students of Forestry and mean 7.22 for the students of the School of Pedagogical and Technological Education) and (2) the dependence of scientists on employers (mean 7.17 and 7.92). Reasons for disagreement are also the desire for personal fame (mean 6.88 and 5.92), the different scientific background and skills of every scientist (mean 6.68 and 5.88), the complexity of climate issues (mean 6.58 and 6.84), approaching the problem through emotion or logic (mean 6.57 and 6.19), the subjective element in each scientist which means seeing different things in the same picture (mean 6.65 and 6.00), the difficulty of proving hypotheses (mean 6.64 and 6.42), and access of scientists to different data (mean 5.55 and 5.40). Through the use of hierarchical analysis in clusters we have the following groups of variables: “financial dependence of scientists”, “possibilities regarding human and material potential”, “personality of scientists”, and “nature of the problem”. Generally, the scientific information regarding the increase of global temperature as a result of the greenhouse effect receives low grades by both the students of Forestry and the students of the School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (6.73 and 6.42). However, both groups believe that we should not wait for more convincing scientific information in order to adopt the necessary measures for confronting the problem (57.1% and 87.9%).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adans S (2001) Views of the uncertainties of climate change: a comparison of high school students and specialists. Can J Environ Educ 6:58–76
Bartholomew D, Steele F, Moustaki I, Galbraith J (2002) The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL
Behrakis T (1999) Multivariate data analysis: methods and applications. Livanis, Athens
Berk RA, Schulman D (1995) Public perceptions of global warming. Clim Change 29(1):1–33
Chalmers AF (1999) What is this thing called science? University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland
Daoutopoulos GA (1994) Methodology of social research in rural areas, 2nd edn. Thessaloniki
Doble J, Richardson A, Danks A (1990) Science and the public: a report in three volumes, vol 3: Global warming caused by the greenhouse effect. Public Agenda Foundation, New York
Dunlap RE (1994) International attitudes towards environment and development. Green Globe Yearbook. Oxford University Press, New York
Feyerabend PK (1975) Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Verso, London
Filias V, Pappas P, Antonopoulou Μ, Zarnari O, Magganara Ι, Meimaris Μ, Nikolakopoulos I, Papachristou E, Perantzaki Ι, Sampson E, Psychogios E (2000) Introduction to the methodology and techniques of social research. Gutenberg, Athens
Karapistolis DN (2001) Data analysis and market research. Annikoulas, Thessaloniki
Karlis D (2005) Multivariate statistical analysis. Ath. Stamoulis, Athens
Kothari CR (2006) Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Age International, New Delhi
Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Leal Filho W (2008) Communicating climate change: challenges ahead and actions needed. In: Climate 2008 Online Conference, 3–7 Nov 2008. Available at http://www.climate2008.net/?a1=pap&cat=3&e=30
Leal Filho W, Manolas E, Pace P (2009) The contribution of education towards meeting the challenges of climate change. Paper presented to the Global Conference on Global Warming 2009, Istanbul, 5–9 July 2009. Available at http://www.gcgw.org/gcgw09/documents/GCGW09-program-v6.pdf
McBean GA, Hengeveld HG (2000) Communicating the science of climate change: a mutual challenge for scientists and educators. Can J Environ Educ 5:9–25
Oppenheim A.N. (1973) Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. Heinemann, London
Siardos GΚ (1999) Multivariate statistical analysis methods. Part 1: Exploring the relations between variables. Zitis, Thessaloniki
Weber M (1949) The methodology of the social sciences. Free, Glenncoe, IL, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tampakis, S.A., Pantazis, V.E., Manolas, E.I. (2011). The Increase of Global Temperature as a Result of the Greenhouse Effect: Assessing the Reasons for Disagreement Among Scientists. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) The Economic, Social and Political Elements of Climate Change. Climate Change Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14775-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14776-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)