Can Mirror-Reading Reverse the Flow of Time?
- 1.5k Downloads
Across cultures, people conceptualize time as if it flows along a horizontal timeline, but the direction of this implicit timeline is culture-specific: in cultures with left-to-right orthography (e.g., English-speaking cultures) time appears to flow rightward, but in cultures with right-to-left orthography (e.g., Arabic-speaking cultures) time flows leftward. Can orthography influence implicit time representations independent of other cultural and linguistic factors? Native Dutch speakers performed a space-time congruity task with the instructions and stimuli written in either standard Dutch or mirror-reversed Dutch. Participants in the Standard Dutch condition were fastest to judge past-oriented phrases by pressing the left button and future-oriented phrases by pressing the right button. Participants in the Mirror-Reversed Dutch condition showed the opposite pattern of reaction times, consistent with results found previously in native Arabic and Hebrew speakers. These results demonstrate a causal role for writing direction in shaping implicit mental representations of time.
KeywordsCulture Metaphor Orthography Space Time
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Clark, H.H.: Space, time, semantics and the child. In: Moore, T.E. (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, pp. 27–63. Academic Press, New York (1973)Google Scholar
- 2.Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live by. The Chicago University Press, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
- 6.Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J.: Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cog. Sci. 30, 749–757 (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Cienki, A.: Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In: Koening, J.-P. (ed.) Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, pp. 189–204. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Fuhrman, O., Boroditsky, L.: Mental time-lines follow writing direction: Comparing English and Hebrew speakers. In: Proceedings of 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., Gabay, S.: Is the future the right time? Exp. Psych. (in press)Google Scholar
- 13.Casasanto, D.: When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In: Evans, V., Pourcel, S. (eds.) New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 127–145. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Boroditsky, L.: Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think Differently About Time? In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 575–580. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (2008)Google Scholar
- 18.Evans, V.: The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
- 19.Casasanto, D.: Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. JEP: General 138(3), 351–367 (2009)Google Scholar
- 20.Casasanto, D.: Motor experience shapes abstract concepts. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA (2009)Google Scholar
- 21.Suitner, C.: Where to place social targets? Stereotyping and Spatial Agency Bias. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Padova (2009)Google Scholar
- 23.Emmorey, K.: Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In: Gattis, M. (ed.) Spatial schemas and abstract thought, pp. 147–174. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar