Advertisement

Aligning Spatial Perspective in Route Descriptions

  • Elena Andonova
Conference paper
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6222)

Abstract

Spatial perspective refers to the use of reference systems in extended spatial descriptions and wayfinding. Variable viewpoints, conceptualizations, and reference terms may lead speakers to describe an environment and movement in it in a route perspective or a survey/gaze perspective. Previous research has indicated the role of a number of environmental, individual, and learning factors in choice of perspective. Here, in two experiments set up in a confederate experimental paradigm with speakers taking turns in describing routes on schematic maps, choice of spatial perspective was influenced also by the use of perspective of the dialogic partner, both before and after they switch perspective. Perspective priming did not occur when partners used perspective inconsistently, however. Participants with low spatial ability as assessed in a self-report measure did not align with their partner when the switch was from route to survey perspective. Results are discussed in the framework of interactive alignment. These studies also found considerable inter-individual variation in the stability vs. flexibility of spatial perspective use.

Keywords

Spatial Ability Ability Group Spatial Perspective Route Description Early Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tversky, B., Lee, P.U., Mainwaring, S.: Why Speakers Mix Perspectives. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 399–412 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kriz, S., Hegarty, M.: Spatial Perspective in Spoken Descriptions of Real World Environments at Different Scales. In: Proceedings of XXVII Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor, H.A., Naylor, S.J., Chechile, N.A.: Goal-specific Influences on the Representation of Spatial Perspective. Memory & Cognition 27(2), 309–319 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Perspective in Spatial Descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 371–391 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bugmann, D., Coventry, K.R., Newstead, S.E.: Contextual Cues and the Retrieval of Information from Cognitive Maps. Memory & Cognition 35(3), 381–392 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vorwerg, C.: Consistency in Successive Spatial Utterances. In: Coventry, K.R., Tenbrink, T., Bateman, J. (eds.) Spatial Language and Dialogue (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schober, M.F.: Spatial Perspective-taking in Conversation. Cognition 47, 1–24 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Striegnitz, K., Tepper, P., Lovett, A., Cassel, J.: Knowledge Representation for Generating Locating Gestures in Route Directions. In: Coventry, K.R., Tenbrink, T., Bateman, J. (eds.) Spatial Language and Dialogue (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watson, M.E., Pickering, M.J., Branigan, H.P.: Alignment of Reference Frames in Dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 26th Cognitive Science Meeting. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levelt, W.J.M.: Cognitive Styles in the Use of Spatial Direction Terms. In: Jarvella, R.J., Klein, W. (eds.) Speech, Place, and Action. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schober, M.: Spatial Dialogue between Partners with Mismatched Abilities. In: Coventry, K.R., Tenbrink, T., Bateman, J. (eds.) Spatial Language and Dialogue (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pickering, M., Garrod, S.: The Interactive Alignment Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2), 169–189 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brennan, S.E., Clark, H.H.: Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22(6), 1482–1493 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., McLean, J.F., Cleland, A.A.: Syntactic Alignment and Participant Role in Dialogue. Cognition 104, 163–197 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andonova, E., Coventry, K.: Alignment and Priming of Spatial Perspective. In: Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Hjalmarsson, A., Skantze, G. (eds.) Proceedings of Diaholmia, Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. KTH, Stockholm (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Andonova
    • 1
  1. 1.SFB/TR8 Spatial CognitionUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations