Do All Science Disciplines Rely on Spatial Abilities? Preliminary Evidence from Self-report Questionnaires
- 1.6k Downloads
Spatial abilities are correlated with success in science. However, research on this topic has not focused on possible differences in the spatial demands of different scientific fields. Furthermore, there is a partial dissociation between spatial abilities involved in dealing with the space of environments (large-scale spatial abilities) and those involved in dealing with the space of objects (small-scale spatial abilities). We used on-line self-report measures to collect preliminary data on the spatial abilities of scientists in different fields, as well as humanists and individuals in professional fields. Geoscientists had the highest self-report ratings of both environmental and small-scale spatial abilities, whereas geographers had relatively high self ratings of environmental spatial abilities and engineers had relatively high self ratings of small-scale spatial abilities. Other scientific disciplines did not differ from the mean in self reported spatial abilities. Self ratings of verbal ability were uncorrelated with self ratings of spatial abilities and, as expected, were highest for humanities specialists.
Keywordsspatial ability visualization scale science disciplines STEM fields
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M., Hegarty, M.: Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31, 549–579 (2007)Google Scholar
- 2.Sorby, S.A.: A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 7, 153–172 (2001)Google Scholar
- 4.Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., Kali, Y.: Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education 45, 129–132 (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Peters, M., Chisholm, P., Laeng, B.: Spatial ability, student gender and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Edcuation 84, 69–73 (1995)Google Scholar
- 7.Schueneman, A.L., Pickelman, J., Hesslein, R., Freeark, R.J.: Neuropsychological predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 96, 288–295 (1984)Google Scholar
- 8.Keehner, M.M., Tendick, F., Meng, M.V., Anwar, H.P., Hegarty, M., Stoller, M.L., Duh, Q.: Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. The American Journal of Surgery 188, 71–75 (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.Hegarty, M., Waller, D.: Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 121–169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Montello, D.R.: Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I. (eds.) COSIT 1993. LNCS, vol. 716, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar
- 17.Crookes, R.D., Shipley, T.F., Hegarty, M.: Development of a self-report measure of spatial reasoning abilities. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association Meeting, Brooklyn, NY (March 2010)Google Scholar
- 20.Kastens, K.: Synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences: Developing representational competence. Presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America, October 18-21 (2009)Google Scholar