Skip to main content
  • 1005 Accesses

Abstract

Administratively, the territories of Transjordan (a neutral term for what is now Jordan) have always belonged to different provinces. During the Late Byzantine or Early Islamic periods, the administrative borderlines were imposed by geographic rather than political considerations. They were generally running from east to west (Hitti 1970; Watson 2001). Hence, we can distinguish three major regions in Transjordan: northern, central and southern. While the northern one certainly had privileged relations with north Palestine and Syria, the central region had close relations with Palestine, and the southern played an important role in relations with south Arabia and Egypt. In times of peace as well as in times of war, Transjordan has therefore played an important role as a platform for trade and warfare in both north-south and east-west directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Hitti PK (1970) History of the Arabs: from the earliest times to the present, 10th edn. MacMillan St. Martin’s Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti M (1981) Composition of Roman pottery from Lousonna (Switzerland). In: Hughes MJ (ed) Scientific studies in ancient ceramics, British Museum Occasional Paper 19. London, pp 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti M (1982) Phase analysis and its significance for technology and origin. In: Olin JS, Franklin AD (eds) Archaeological ceramics. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts AR, Wilson N (1994) Application of petrofabric and phase equilibria analysis to the study of a potsherd. J Archaeol Sci 21:607–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick R (1995) The Christian Communities of Palestine from Byzantine to Islamic Rule: a historical and archaeological study. The Darwin Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley A (2001) Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk Jordan and the Crusader Interlude. In: MacDonald B et al (eds) The archaeology of Jordan. Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press, pp 515–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson P (2001) The Byzantine period. In: MacDonald B et al (eds) The archaeology of Jordan. Sheffield Academic, Sheffield, pp 461–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb D (2001) Umayyad and Abbasid periods. In: MacDonald B et al (eds) The archaeology of Jordan. Sheffield Academic, Sheffield, pp 503–513

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. M. Alawneh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alawneh, F.M., Béarat, H.A. (2011). Late Byzantine-Early Islamic Ceramic Technology, Transjordan. In: Turbanti-Memmi, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Archaeometry, 13th - 16th May 2008, Siena, Italy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14678-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics