Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Implantate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AE-Manual der Endoprothetik

Zusammenfassung

Generell müssen Hüftprothesen so gestaltet sein, dass sie sich auf sichere Art implantieren lassen und als lasttragende Bauteile ihre Funktion wahrnehmen können. Dahingehend sind sie auf die jeweilig vorliegende Indikation abgestimmt, in die Operationstechnik eingebunden, planbar und entsprechend instrumentiert. Sie erlauben die gewünschte Rekonstruktion des Gelenkdrehzentrums bei stabiler Verankerung von Schaft und Pfanne im Prothesenlager. Innerhalb der von den Herstellern als kompatibel deklarierten Komponenten sind die Köpfe resp. Artikulationssysteme frei wählbar. Fremdpaarungen sind nicht zulässig. Des Weiteren folgen sie den weltweit und regional verbindlichen Regelwerken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aldinger PR, Thomsen M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Breusch SJ (2003) Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems: excellent 10–15-year survival in 141 young patients. Arch Orthop Scand 74:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstutz HC, Grigoris P (1996) Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329(Suppl):S11–S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archard JF (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24:981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:385–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baur W, Hönle W, Schuh A (2005) Histopathologische Veränderungen im umgebenden Gewebe von revidierten Metall/Metallgleitpaarungen. Orthopäde 34:225–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR et al (1997) Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 yrs old: 7- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:216–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berli BJ (2003) 100 % 10-year survival of a hybrid total hip replacement (MS-30 cemented stem and Morscher Press-Fit cup). EFFORT, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Berli BJ, Elke R, Morscher EW (2003) The cemented MS-30 stem in total hip replacement, matte versus polished surface: minimum of five years of clinical and radio-graphic results of a prospective study. In: Winters GL, Nutt MJ (Hrsg) Stainless steels for medical and surgical applications. ASTM STP 1438:249–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bläsius K, Cotta H, Schneider U, Thomsen E (1993) CLS Multicenter-Studie. 8 Jahre Erfahrungen. Z Orthop 131:477–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehler M, Plenk H Jr, Salzer M (2000) Alumina ceramic bearings for hip endoprostheses: the Austrian experiences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin P (2000) Total hip arthroplasty using a ceramic prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon CR, Barrett S, Martell JM et al (2006) Steady-state penetration rates of electron beam-irradiated, highly cross-linked polyethylene at an average 45-month follow-up. J Arthroplast 21:935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bülow JU, Lani L, Arnold P, Scheller G, Tanner M (1996) Erste Langzeitergebnisse mit dem zementfreien CLS-Schaft von Spotorno. OP-J 12:228–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Cales B (2000) Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:94–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan JJ, Albright JC, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC (2000) Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement: minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:487–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell P (2007) Is metal sensitivity an issue with modern metal-metal hips? Cross Fire 2 – Allergy and Sensitivity to Orthopaedic Implants, 8th EFORT. Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli CC, D’angelo F, Molina M, Ferrario A, Cherubino P (1999) Radiographic evaluation of the „conus“ uncemented stem. Hip Int 9:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi MG, Koh HS, Kluess D, O’Connor D, Mathur A, Rubin J, Zhou D, Sung P (2005) Effects of titanium particle size on osteoblast functions in vitro and in vivo. PNAS 102:4578–4583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis MJ, Jinnah RH, Wilson VD, Hungerford DS (1992) The initial stability of uncemented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B:372–376

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN et al (2005) Five-year experience with crossfire highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey JR, Tozakoglou E (1999) The role of the lateral offset stems. Orthop Trans 22:273

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay und Kapandji (1998) 7. All reasons Survivorship of rough-surfaced threaded acetabular cups. 382 consecutive primary Zweymüller cups followed for 0.2–12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 4:379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P (2004) Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:6–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doehring TC, Tradonsky S, Froimson AI, Greenwald AS (1996) Micromotion of acetabular liners: measurements comparing the effectiveness of locking mechanisms. Orthop Res Soc, 42nd Annual Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C et al (2005) Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:1816–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujovne AR, Bobyn JD, Krygier JJ, Miller JE, Brooks CE (1993) Mechanical compatibility of noncemented hip prostheses with the human femur. J Arthroplast 8:7–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elke R (2001) Partikelkrankheit. Ist die Tribologie ein Thema in der Revisionschirurgie? Orthopäde 30:258–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ender SA, Machner A, Pap G, Grasshoff H, Neumann HW (2006) The femoral neck prosthesis CUT. Three- to six-year results. Orthopäde 35:841–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engh CA, Stepniewski AS, Ginn SD et al (2006) A randomized prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked Marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J Arthroplast 21(Suppl 2):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink B, Fuerst M, Hahn M, Thybaud L, Sieber HP, Delling G (2005) Principles of fixation of the cementless modular revision stem REVITAN. Unfallchirurg 108:1029–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J, Jin Z, Tipper J, Stone M, Ingham E (2006) Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Madero R, Ortega-Andreu M (2003) Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymuller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:296–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill T, Sledge J, Müller M (1998) The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B:946–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman AH, Crowninshield RD, Schenck R, Herberts P (2001) A low stiffness composite biologically fixed prosthesis. Clin Orthop 393:128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granchi D, Cenni E, Trisolino G, Giunti A, Baldini N (2005) Sensitivity to implant materials in patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Green TR, Fischer J, Matthews JB et al (2000) Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant UHMWPE-particles. J Biomed Mater Res 53:490–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grubl A, Chiari C, Gruber M, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2002) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubl A, Csepan R, Delaunay C, Gordes W, Kaider A, Parzer R, Zenz P, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2003) Six to ten year results of use of the alloclassic hip prosthesis – a multicentre survival analysis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtner P, Aebi M, Ganz R (1993) Die Pfannendachschale in der Revisions-Arthroplastik der Hüfte. Z Orthop 131:594–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haentjens P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P (1993) Cemented acetabular reconstruction with the müller support ring – a minimum five-year clinical and roentgenographic follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:225–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Stafford T, Glant T, Jacobs JJ (2005) Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23:384–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris WH, Muratoglu OK (2005) A review of current cross-linked polyethylenes used in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes DR (2004) Bone lysis and inflammation. Inflamm Res 53:596–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heisel C, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP (2004) Short-term in vivo wear of cross-linked polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:748–751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper RH, Young AM, Orishimo KF, McAuley JP (2003) Correlation between early and late wear rates in total hip arthroplasty with application to the performance of Marathon cross-linked polyethylene liners. J Arthroplast 18(Suppl 1):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jazrawi LM, Bogner E, Della Valle CJ, Chen FS, Pak KI, Stuchin SA, Frankel VH, Di Cesare PE (1999) Wear rates of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip implants: a 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 14:781–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh BF, Dewitz MA, Ilstrup DM, Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1989) Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement: fifteen-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71-A:1496–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempf I, Semlitsch M (1990) Massive wear of a steel ball head by ceramic fragments in the polyethylene acetabular cup after revision of a total hip prosthesis with fractured ceramic ball. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:284–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knahr K et al (2003) Der Revisionsschaft Revitan Kurviert: Konstruktionsmerkmale und Implantationstechnik. ÖGO Kongress 2003, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  • Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T (2006) Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88-A:1183–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latimer HA, Lachiewicz PF (1996) Porous-coated acetabular components with screw fixation: five- to ten-year results. J Bone Joint Surg 78-A:975–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Legenstein R, Huber W, Boesch P (2007) Metallosis in metal-on-metal PPF total hip arthroplasties. In: Chang JD, Billau K (Hrsg) Bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 193–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li S (2001) Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: from Charnley to cross-linked. Oper Tech Orthop 11:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner F, Huber M, Böhm G, Zweymüller K (2005) Geben mehrkernige Riesenzellen in der Synovia von Hüft-Totalendoprothesen mit Metall-Metall-Artikulation Hinweise auf einen durch Kobalt verursachten Gewebeschaden? Osteologie 14:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lison D (1996) Human toxicity of cobalt-containing dust and experimental studies on the mechanism of interstitial lung disease (hard metal disease). Crit Rev Toxicol 26:585–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann CH, Nuechtern JV, Willert HG, Junk-Jantsch S, Ruether W, Pflueger G (2007) Hypersensitivity reactions in total hip arthroplasty. http://www.orthosupersite.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Looney RJ, Schwarz EM, Boyd A, O’Keefe RJ (2006) Periprostethic osteolysis: an immunologist’s update. Curr Opin Rheumatol 18:80–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald SJ (2004) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie JR, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Brown TD (1994) Areas of contact and extent of gaps with implantation of oversized acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:127–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malchau H (2000) Prognosis of total hip replacement: update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty. Registry 1997–1998 Scientific Exhibition. 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchau H (2003) Swedish National Hip Arthoplasty Register Annual Report 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G, Södermann P, Eisler T (2002) Prognosis of total hip replacement. Update of results and risk-ratio analysis for revision and re-revision from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register 1979–2000. Scientific Exhibition, 69th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Dallas, 13–17 Feb. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning DW, Chiang PP, Martell JM, Galante JO, Harris WH (2005) In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 20:880–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martell JM, Verner JJ, Incavo SJ (2003) Clinical performance of a highly crosslinked polyethylene at two years in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplast 18(Suppl 1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R (1999) Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17:157–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekert P (2003) Next generation ceramic bearings. In: Zippel H, Dietrich M (Hrsg) Bioceramics in joint arthroplasty. Steinkopf, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cör A, Pisot V (2006) Survivorship and retrieved analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacement at a mean of seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88-A:1171–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawietz L, Gehrke T, Schröder JH (2006) Histopathologische Diagnostik der Endoprothesenlockerung. Pathologe 27:439–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morey BF (1997) Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop 344:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumenthaler A (1992) Geschichte des Hüftgelenkersatzes. OP-J 8:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH (2001) A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplast 16:149–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ et al (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 235:148–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner PE (Hrsg) (2003) Die Hüfttotalprothese, Implantationstechnik und lokale Komplikationen. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otto M, Kriegsmann J, Gehrke T, Bertz S (2006) Abriebpartikel – Schlüssel der aseptischen Prothesenlockerung? Pathologe 27:447–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL (2005) Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1515–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poggie R, Takeuchi M, Averill R, Nasser S (1998) Accelerated aging and associated changes in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) microstructure as a function of resin type and consolidation variables. In: Gsell RA (Hrsg) Characterization and properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. ASTM STP 1307:120–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Pospischill M et al (2005) Cementless total hip arthroplasty using a threaded cup and a rectangular tapered stem. Follow up for 10 to 17 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Postak PD, Tradonsky S, Froimson AI, Rubash HE (1992) Performance characteristics of two-piece acetabular cups, series II. Orthopaedics Research Laboratories, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Cleveland, AAOS paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter-Hintz D, Rieker J, Rauch L, Homey Bl (2004) Prothesenunverträglichkeit bei Typ-IV-Sensibilisierung gegen Knochenzement. Hautarzt 55:987–989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieker CB, Schön R, Köttig P (2004) Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplast 19(Suppl 3):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrl S, Nivbrant B, Mingguo L, Hewitt B (2005) In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: a radiostereometry analysis study. J Arthroplast 20:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk RK, Wehrli K (1989) Zur Reaktion des Knochens auf eine zementfreie SL-Femur-Revisionsprothese. Orthopäde 18:454–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MB, Hamilton JV (1996) The effect of calcium stearate on the properties of UHMWPE. 42nd ORS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, paper 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner U, Scheller G, Herbig J, Jani L (2001) Mid-term results of the cementless CLS stem. A 7- to 11-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:321–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC (1993) The outcome of Charnley hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75-A:961–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedel L (2000) Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch M (1989) Twenty years of Sulzer experience with artificial hip joint materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 203:159–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch M, Willert HG (1997) Clinical wear behaviour of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cups paired with metal and ceramic ball heads in comparison to metal-on-metal pairings of hip joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:73–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch M, Lehmann M, Weber H, Doerre E, Willert HG (1977) New prospects for a prolonged functional life-span of artificial hip joints by using the material combination polyethylene/aluminium oxide ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res 11:537–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SL, Dowson D, Goldsmith AA (2001) The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 215:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling K et al (1997) Müller straight stem – survival rate after 12 yrs. Acta Orthop Scand 68(Suppl 277):28

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotorno L, Schenk RK, Dietschi C, Romagnoli S, Mumenthaler A (1987) Personal experiences with uncemented prostheses. Orthopäde 16:225–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spotorno L, Grappiolo G, Penenberg BL, Burastero G (2002) Eight to eleven year review of hybrid THA using a polished femoral stem and cementless titanium acetabulum. Procs American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Annaheim [Abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Streicher RM (1989) Investigation on sterilization and modification of high-molecular weight polyethylene by ionizing irradiation. Beta Gamma 1:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Streicher RM, Thomsen M (2003) Polyethylen als Implantatwerkstoff. Orthopäde 32:23–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sychterz CJ, Orishimo KF, Engh CA (2004) Sterilization and polyethylene wear: clinical studies to support laboratory data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1017–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Barnstorf S, Rueff F, Przybilla B, Summer B (2004). Kontaktallergie gegen Endoprothesenkomponenten als mögliche Ursache einer Knieendoprothesen- Unverträglichkeit. Allergo J 13:51

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Bandl WD, Maier S, Summer B, Przybilla B (2006a) Hypersensitivity to titanium osteosynthesis with impaired fracture healing, eczema and T-cell hyperresponsiveness in vitro: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermat 55:199–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Oppel T, Maier S, Przybilla B (2006b) Die Rolle von Knochenzementkomponenten bei der Unverträglichkeit von Knieendoprothesen. Allergo J 15:48

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Schuh A, Ring J, Thomsen M (2008) Orthopädisch-chirurgische Implantate und Allergien. Gemeinsame Stellungnahme des Arbeitskreises Implantatallergie (AK20) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (DGOOC), der Deutschen Kontaktallergie Gruppe (DKG) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und Klinische Immunologie (DGAKI). Orthopäde 37:75–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Braathen LR, Dörig M, Auböck J, Nestle F, Werfel T, Willert HG (2009) Increased metal sensitivity and periimplant T-lymphocytic inflammation in patients with failed metal-to-metal total hip replacement. Allergy 64:1157–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen M, Strachwitz B von, Mau H, Cotta H (1995) Werkstoffübersicht in der Endoprothetik. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 133:1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen M, Willmann G (2003) Keramische Gleitpaarungen in der Orthopädie. Orthopäde 32:11–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traulsen FC, Hassenpflug J, Hahne HJ (2001) Long-term results with cement-free total hip prostheses (Zweymuller). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:206–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Triclot P, Grosjean G, El Masri F, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M (2007) A comparison of the penetration rate of two polyethylene acetabular liners of different levels of cross-linking. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:1439–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udofia IJ, Jin ZM (2003) Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip-resurfacing prostheses. J Biomech 36:537–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linde A, Torino (2001) Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 patients followed for a mean of 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 72:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervest TM, Anderson PG, Van Hout F, Wapstra FH, Louwerse RT, Koetsier JW (2005) Ten to twelve-year results with the Zweymuller cementless total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplast 20:362–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, Gautier E (2000) The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery. A mean follow-up of 12 yrs. J Arthroplast 15:959–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Wagner M (1995) Conical stem fixation for cementless hip prostheses for primary implantation and revisions. In: Morscher EW (Hrsg) Endoprosthetics. Springer, Berlin, S 258

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Wagner M (1999) The transfemoral approach for revision of total hip replacement. Orthop Traumatol 7:260–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Wagner M (2000) Cone prosthesis for the hip joint. Reprint from Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:88–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ML, Sharkey PF, Tuan RS (2004) Particle bioreactivity and wear-mediated osteolysis. J Arthroplast 19:1028–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh W (1990) John Charnley – the man and the hip. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber BG (1988) Pressurized cement fixation in tatal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:87–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber BG, Rieker CB (2002) The history of Metasul. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 69:277–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenhielm LR (1995) Cemented collarless (Exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components. J Arthroplast 10:192–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenhielm LR, Mikhail WE, Nelissen RG et al (1994) Surgical technique and early results in revision of a total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, collarless, tapered, polished stem and contained morselized allograft. J Orthop Tech 2:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissinger M, Helmreich C (2001) Long-term results with Zweymuller cement-free Alloclassic stem. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:200–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willert HG, Buchhorn A, Fayyazi A, Lohmann CH (2000) Histopathologische Veränderungen bei Metall/Metall-Gelenken geben Hinweise auf eine zellvermittelte Überempfindlichkeit. Osteologie 9:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Willert HG, Buchhorn A, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehntner MK, Ganz R (1994) Midterm results (5.5–10 yrs) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplast 9:469–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zimmer GmbH, Sulzer-Allee 8, 8404, Winterthur, Schweiz

    Roland Willi & Claude Rieker

  2. Fachabteilung für Orthopädie, DRK-Klinik Baden-Baden, Lilienmattstraße 5, 76530, Baden-Baden, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. med. Marc Thomsen

  3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Frauenlobstraße 9–11, 80337, München, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. med. Peter Thomas

Authors
  1. Roland Willi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claude Rieker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. med. Marc Thomsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prof. Dr. med. Peter Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Willi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität Ulm / Inst. für Unfallchir., Helmholtzstraße 14, Ulm, 89081, Germany

    Lutz Claes

  2. St. Vinzenz- und Elisabeth-Hospital, Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, An der Goldgrube 11, Mainz, 55131, Germany

    Peter Kirschner

  3. Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Centrum f. Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany

    Carsten Perka

  4. Orthopädische Klinik, König Ludwig Haus, Universität Würzburg, Brettreichstraße 11, Würzburg, 97074, Germany

    Maximilian Rudert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endoprothetik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willi, R., Rieker, C., Thomsen, M., Thomas, P. (2012). Implantate. In: Claes, L., Kirschner, P., Perka, C., Rudert, M. (eds) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14646-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14646-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14645-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14646-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation