A Comparison of Dominant AHP/CCM and AHP/ANP
The Theory of Games is a conflict descriptive type model designed to minimize one’s loss. AHP, on the other hand, is a conflict solving type model and offers a method to describe which element in the conflict is more critical. This paper analyze the comparison of Dominant AHP/CCM (Concurrent Convergence Method), proposed by Kinoshita and Nakanishi, with AHP/ANP, proposed by Saaty and present the calculation methods and the mathematical structure of the former in the process.
KeywordsEvaluation Criterion Weight Vector Mathematical Structure Evaluation Matrix Aggregate Score
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Network Process. Expert Choice (1996)Google Scholar
- 3.Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: A Proposal of a New Viewpoint in Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, IV-36-569, 1–8 (July 1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: A Proposal of CCM as a Processing Technique for Additional Data in the Dominant AHP. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, IV-42-611, 13–19 (July 1999)Google Scholar