Advertisement

A Double-Shell Design Approach for Multiobjective Optimal Design of Microgrids

  • Maria Luisa Di Silvestre
  • Giuseppe Fileccia Scimemi
  • Mariano Giuseppe Ippolito
  • Eleonora Riva Sanseverino
  • Gaetano Zizzo
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 4)

Abstract

This work develops a new double shell approach to optimal design for multi-objective optimally managed systems. The cost of each design solution can be defined by the evaluation of operational issues and capital costs. In most systems, the correct definition of operational issues can be deduced by means of the solution of a multi-objective optimization problem. The evaluation of each design solution must thus be deduced using the outcome of a multi-objective optimization run, namely a Pareto hyper-surface in the n-dimensional space of operational objectives. In the literature, the design problem is usually solved by considering a single objective formulation of the operational issue. In this paper, the proposed double shell approach is implemented using evolutionary computation and it is explained considering the problem of optimal microgrids design. For this problem the multiple operational impacts identification corresponds to the solution of the optimal unit commitment of generators. After an introductory part, the particular problem formulation is presented and an interesting application of the considered approach to a medium size micro-grid is shown.

Keywords

Pareto Front Multiobjective Optimization Design Solution Unit Commitment Unit Commitment Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alarcon-Rodriguez, A., Ault, G., Galloway, S.: Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the stat-of-the-art generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Available on line, 1–14 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alarcon-Rodriguez, A., Haesen, E., Ault, G., Driesen, J., Belmans, R.: Multiobjective planning framework for stochastiic and controllable distributed energy resources. IET, Journal in Renewable Power Generation 3(2), 227–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3(4), 257–271 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertani, A., Borghetti, A., Bossi, C., De Biase, L., Lamquet, O., Massucco, S., Morini, A., Nucci, C.A., Paolone, M., Quaia, E., Silvestro, F.: Management of Low Voltage Grids with High Penetration of Distributed Generation: concepts, implementations and experiments. In: Cigre (ed.) Proceedings of CIGRE 2007 Session (paper C6-304) Paris, France (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission, European SmartGrids technology platform: Vision and strategy for Europe’s electricity networks of the future (April 2006), http://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/pdf/smartgrids_en.pdf, http://www.smartgrids.eu
  6. 6.
    Padhy, N.P.: Unit commitment – a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(2), 1196–1205 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.A.: Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 849–858. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deb, K.: An Efficient Constraint-handling Method for Genetic Algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 186(2-4), 311–338 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krishnanand, K.N., Ghose, D.: Glowworm swarm optimization for simultaneous capture of multiple local optima of multimodal functions. Swarm Intell. 3, 87–124 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das, D., Kothari, D.P., Kalam, A.: Simple and efficient method for load flow solution of radial distribution networks. International Journal on Electrical Power and Energy Systems (EPES) 17(5), 335–346 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Luisa Di Silvestre
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Fileccia Scimemi
    • 2
  • Mariano Giuseppe Ippolito
    • 1
  • Eleonora Riva Sanseverino
    • 1
  • Gaetano Zizzo
    • 1
  1. 1.DIEET, University of PalermoItaly
  2. 2.DISAG, University of PalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations