Advertisement

Towards Semantic-Aware and Ontology-Based e-Government Service Integration – An Applicative Case Study of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah Scholarship Program

  • Abdullah Alqahtani
  • Haiyan Lu
  • Jie Lu
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 4)

Abstract

By improving the quality of e-government services by enabling access to services across different government agencies through one portal, services integration plays a key role in e-government development. This paper proposes a conceptual framework of ontology based e-government service integration, using Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah Scholarship Program (SAKASP) as a case study. SAKASP is a multi-domain program in which students must collect information from various Ministries to complete applications and the administering authority must verify the information supplied by the Ministries. The current implementation of SAKASP is clumsy because it is a mixture of online submission and manual collection and verification of information; its time-consuming and tedious procedures are inconvenient for the applicants and inefficient for the administrators. The proposed framework provides an integrated service by employing semantic web service (SWS) and ontology, improving the current implementation of SAKASP by automatically collecting and processing the related information for a given application. The article includes a typical scenario that demonstrates the workflow of the framework. This framework is applicable to other multi-domain e-government services.

Keywords

Service Integration Service Ontology Online Submission Applicative Case Study Public Portal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, D., Bertot, J.C., McClure, C.R.: E-Government: initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly 19(4), 349–355 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asunción, G., Mariano, F., Oscar, C.: Ontological engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the semantic Web. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Castellano, M., Pastore, N., Arcieri, F., Summo, V., de Grecis, G.B.: An E-Government Cooperative Framework for Government Agencies. In: HICSS 2005. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 121c (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Goudos, S.K., Loutas, N., Peristeras, V., Tarabanis, K.: Public Administration Domain Ontology for a Semantic Web Services EGovernment Framework. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2007, pp. 270–277 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gugliotta, A., Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Roberto, V.: A Conceptual Model for Semantically-based E-Government Portals. In: International Conference on e-Government, Canada, pp. 101–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Gugliotta, A., Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Roberto, V., Rowlatt, M., Davies, R.: Semantic Web Service-based Architecture for the Interoperability of E-government Services. In: Proceeding of Web Information Systems Modeling Workshop (WISM 2005) in conjunction with the 5th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2005), Sydney, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  8. Hendler, J., Berners-Lee, T., Miller, E.: Integrating Applications on the Semantic Web. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan 122(10), 676–680 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Lara, R., Roman, D., Polleres, A., Fensel, D.: A Conceptual Comparison of WSMO and OWL-S. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Web Services, Erfurt, Germany, September 27-30, pp. 254–269 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Liuming, L., Guojin, Z., Jiaxun, C.: An infrastructure for e-government based on semantic Web services. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 483–486. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Ljiljana, S., Andreas, A., Nenad, S., Rudi, S.: On Managing Changes in the Ontology-Based E-government. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3291, pp. 1080–1097. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  12. McClure, D.L.: Electronic government: Federal initiatives are evolving rapidly but they face significant challenges, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  13. Medjahed, B., Bouguettaya, A., Ouzzani, M.: Semantic web enabled e-government services. Paper Presented to the Proceedings of the 2003 annual national conference on Digital government research, Boston. Digital Government Society of North America (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Medjahed, B., Rezgui, A., Bouguettaya, A., et al.: Infrastructure for e-government Web services. IEEE Internet Computing 7(1), 58–65 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roman, D., Lausen, H., Keller, U., et al.: D2v1.2. Web Service Modeling Ontology, WSMO (2005), http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.1 (Accessed January 1, 2010)
  16. Sanati, F., Jie, L.: Semantic Web for e-government service delivery integration. In: 5th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generation, pp. 459–464. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  17. Tang, J., Li, J., Liang, B., Huang, X., Li, Y., Wang, K.: Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping. Web Semant. 4(4), 243–262 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdullah Alqahtani
    • 1
  • Haiyan Lu
    • 1
  • Jie Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Decision System & e-service Intelligence (DeSl) Lab, Center for Quantum Computation and Intelligent Systems (QCIS), Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Technology SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations