Advertisement

The Effect of Standardization in Multicriteria Decision Analysis on Health Policy Outcomes

  • Jacqueline Young
  • Claus Rinner
  • Dianne Patychuk
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 4)

Abstract

Health planners and epidemiologists have begun to use spatial analysis and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to explore socioeconomic inequalities that can affect population health. In particular, the use of area-based composite indices, also known as deprivation indices, has been effective at incorporating multiple indicators into an analysis. We used GIS-based Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to create a weighted index of health service need, and explored the standardization step in MCDA within a geovisualization environment. In a neighbourhood prioritization scenario for the City of Toronto, we implemented an MCDA using two common standardization techniques and three methods for standardizing cost criteria. We compared the resulting scores and rankings of neighbourhoods, and show that standardization is an important consideration in the data analysis process. We conclude with an assessment of the appropriateness of using one technique over the other as well as the potential effect on decision-making related to health policy.

Keywords

Multicriteria Decision Analysis health policy indicator standardization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N.: Interactive Maps for Visual Data Exploration. International Journal Geographical Information Science 13(4), 355–374 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, N., Schuurman, N., Oliver, L., Hayes, M.V.: Towards the construction of place specific measures of deprivation: a case study from the Vancouver metropolitan area. The Canadian Geographer 51(4), 444–461 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhushan, N., Rai, K.: Strategic decision making applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Breslin, F.C., Smith, P., Dunn, J.R.: An ecological study of regional variation in work injuries among young workers. BMC Public Health 7, 91 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulos, M.N.K.: Towards evidence-based, GIS-driven national spatial health information infrastructure and surveillance services in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Health Geographics 3, 1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. City of Toronto. Toronto’s Racial Diversity. Resource document. City of Toronto (2010a), http://www.toronto.ca/toronto_facts/diversity.htm (Accessed 17 April 2010)
  7. City of Toronto. Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. Resource document. City of Toronto (2010b), http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/neighbourhoods.htm (Accessed 17 April 2010)
  8. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer, New York (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Jankowski, P., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G.: Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(2), 101–127 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malczewski, J.: GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1999)Google Scholar
  11. Malczewski, J., Rinner, C.: Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: a case study of residential quality evaluation. Journal of Geographical Systems 7(2), 249–268 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matheson, F.I., Moineddin, R., Dunn, J.R., Creatore, M.I., Gozdyra, P., Glazier, R.H.: Urban neighbourhoods, chronic stress, gender and depression. Social Science & Medicine 63(10), 2604–2616 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McLafferty, S.L.: GIS and health care. Annual Review of Public Health 24, 25–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Odoi, A., Wray, R., Emo, M., Birch, S., Hutchison, B., Eyles, J., et al.: Inequalities in neighbourhood socioeconomic characteristics: potential evidence-base for neighbourhood health planning. International Journal of Health Geographics 4, 20 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliver, L.N., Dunn, J.R., Kohen, D.E., Hertzman, C.: Do neighbourhoods influence the readiness to learn of kindergarten children in Vancouver? A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood effects. Environment and Planning A 39(4), 848–868 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rinner, C.: A geographic visualization approach to multi-criteria evaluation of urban quality of life. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 21(8), 907–919 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rinner, C., Malczewski, J.: Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA). Journal of Geographical Systems 4(4), 385–403 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rinner, C., Taranu, J.P.: Map-based exploratory evaluation of non-medical determinants of population health. Transactions in GIS 10(4), 633–649 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuurman, N., Bell, N., Hameed, M.S., Simons, R.: A model for identifying and ranking need for trauma service in nonmetropolitan regions based on injury risk and access to services. The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 65(1), 54–62 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline Young
    • 1
  • Claus Rinner
    • 1
  • Dianne Patychuk
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Steps To EquityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations