Advertisement

Integration of Financial and Non-financial Information for Decision-Making by Using Goal Programming and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process on a Capital Budgeting Investment Case Study

  • Yu-Cheng Tang
  • Ching-Ter Chang
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 4)

Abstract

Our objective in this paper is to develop a decision model to assist decision-makers and researchers in understanding the multiple criteria decision making on a capital budgeting investment. This decision model helps decision makers on reducing decision-making time and choosing a suitable decision alternative for a capital budgeting investment under the companies’ goals, constraints and strategies. The methods utilized in this paper are the integration of goal programming (GP) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). We demonstrate a case study of the capital budgeting investment by using these two methods on a small car hire company.

Keywords

Capital Budgeting Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Goal Programming Decision Making Sensitivity Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Kader, M.G., Dugdale, D.: Evaluating investments in advanced manufacturing technology: A fuzzy set theory approach. British Accounting Review 33(4), 455–489 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, D.Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95(3), 649–655 (1996)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Scharge, L.: Lingo 6.0., Lindo system, Inc. (1999)Google Scholar
  4. Sekwat, A.: Capital budgeting practices among Tennessee municipal governments. Government Finance Review, 15–19 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. Tang, Y.C.: An Approach to Budget Allocation for an Aerospace Company–Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Artificial Neural Network. Neurocomputing 72, 3477–3489 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Yu, C.S.: A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems. Computers & Operations Research 29, 1969–2001 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Zahir, S.: Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 112(2), 373–396 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhu, K.J., Jing, Y., Chang, D.Y.: A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 116(3), 450–456 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Cheng Tang
    • 1
  • Ching-Ter Chang
    • 2
  1. 1.National Changhua University of EducationTaiwan
  2. 2.Chang Gung University 

Personalised recommendations