Skip to main content

An Attention Based Theory to Explore the Cognitive Affordances of Diagrams Relative to Text

  • Conference paper
  • 1418 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6170))

Abstract

Why proofs are (usually) text based [1]if diagrams reduce inferential load [1]? The purpose of this poster is to explore ergonomic affordances of text that may encourage its use in proofs by building on prior work in attention [2,3]. We claim that textual notations may focus a reasoner’s “spotlight” of attention through serialized sequential chunks, whereas many diagrams may “diffuse” attention (enabling a reasoner to discern how elements fit together holistically, but with less focus on each element or reifying and explicitly representing connections/relationships between them).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tennant, N.: The Withering Away of Formal Semantics? Mind & Language 1, 302–318 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scholl, B.J.: Objects and attention: the state of the art. Cognition 80, 46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Treisman, A.M., Gelade, G.: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimojima, A., Katagiri, Y.: An Eye-Tracking Study of Exploitations of Spatial Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, 74–88 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballard, D.H., Hayhoe, M.M., Pook, P.K., Rao, R.P.N.: Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 723–767 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spivey, M.J., Geng, J.J.: Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research 65, 235–241 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: Visual information and valid reasoning. In: Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, pp. 9–24. Mathematical Association of America (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Coppin, P. (2010). An Attention Based Theory to Explore the Cognitive Affordances of Diagrams Relative to Text . In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14599-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14600-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics