Skip to main content

A Non-boolean Lattice Derived by Double Indiscernibility

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TRS,volume 6190))

Abstract

The central notion of a rough set is the indiscernibility that is based on an equivalence relation. Because an equivalence relation shows strong bondage in an equivalence class, it forms a Galois connection and the difference between the upper and lower approximations is lost. Here, we introduce two different equivalence relations, one for the upper approximation and one for the lower approximation, and construct a composite approximation operator consisting of different equivalence relations. We show that a collection of fixed points with respect to the operator is a lattice and there exists a representation theorem for that construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pawlak, Z.: Information systems-theoretical foundations. Information Systems 6, 205–218 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Intern. J. Comp. Inform. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory, Coll. Publ., XXV. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambrdige (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Polkowski, L.: Rough Sets. In: Mathematical Foundations. Physical-Verlag/Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doherty, P., Lyukaszewicz, W., Skowron, A., Szalas, A.: Knowledge Representation Techniques. In: A rough Set Approach. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Orlowska, E.: Logic approach to information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 8, 359–378 (1985)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Vakarelov, D.: Modal logic for knowledge representation systems. In: Meyer, A.R., Taitslin, M.A. (eds.) Logic at Botik 1989. LNCS, vol. 363, pp. 257–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlowska, E.: Modal logics in the theory of information systems. Z. Math. Logik u. Grund. d. Math. 30, 213–222 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Järvinen, J.: Pawlakfs information systems in terms of Galois connections and functional dependencies. Fundamenta Informaticae 75, 315–330 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Järvinen, J., Kondo, M., Kortelainen, J.: Modal-like operators in Boolean lattices, Galois connections and fixed points. Fundamenta Informaticae 76, 129–145 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Järvinen, J.: Lattice theory for rough sets. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Düntsch, I., Grzymała-Busse, J.W., Orłowska, E., Polkowski, L. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets VI. LNCS, vol. 4374, pp. 400–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, Y.Y.: A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis. In: Tsumoto, S., Słowiński, R., Komorowski, J., Grzymała-Busse, J.W. (eds.) RSCTC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3066, pp. 59–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao, Y.Y.: Concept lattices in rough set theory. In: Fuzzy Information, Processing NAFIPS f04, vol. 2, pp. 796–801 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gediga, G., Düntsch, I.: Modela-style operators in qualitative data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 155–162 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lin, T.Y.: A review of rough set models. In: Lin, T.Y., Cercone, N. (eds.) Rough Sets and Data Mining: Analysis for Imprecise Data, pp. 47–75. Kluwer Academic Pub., Boston (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Ore, O.: Galois connexions. Transactions of American Mathematical Society 55, 493–513 (1944)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. In: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Pub., Boston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gunji, YP., Haruna, T. (2010). A Non-boolean Lattice Derived by Double Indiscernibility. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Słowiński, R., Lingras, P., Miao, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets XII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14467-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14467-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14466-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14467-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics