Skip to main content

Anatomical Landmark Based Registration of Contrast Enhanced T1-Weighted MR Images

  • Conference paper
Biomedical Image Registration (WBIR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6204))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In many problems involving multiple image analysis, an image registration step is required. One such problem appears in brain tumor imaging, where baseline and follow-up image volumes from a tumor patient are often to-be compared. Nature of the registration for a change detection problem in brain tumor growth analysis is usually rigid or affine. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted MR images are widely used in clinical practice for monitoring brain tumors. Over this modality, contours of the active tumor cells and whole tumor borders and margins are visually enhanced. In this study, a new technique to register serial contrast enhanced T1 weighted MR images is presented. The proposed fully-automated method is based on five anatomical landmarks: eye balls, nose, confluence of sagittal sinus, and apex of superior sagittal sinus. After extraction of anatomical landmarks from fixed and moving volumes, an affine transformation is estimated by minimizing the sum of squared distances between the landmark coordinates. Final result is refined with a surface registration, which is based on head masks confined to the surface of the scalp, as well as to a plane constructed from three of the extracted features. The overall registration is not intensity based, and it depends only on the invariant structures. Validation studies using both synthetically transformed MRI data, and real MRI scans, which included several markers over the head of the patient were performed. In addition, comparison studies against manual landmarks marked by a radiologist, as well as against the results obtained from a typical mutual information based method were carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Modersitzki, J.: Numerical methods for image registration. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zitova, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 21, 977–1000 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, B., Modersitzki, J.: Ill-posed medicine–an introduction to image registration. Inverse Problems 24, 1–16 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Maintz, J., Viergever, M.: A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 2, 1–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Angelini, E., Clatz, O., Mandonnet, E., Konukoglu, E., Capelle, L., Duffau, H.: Glioma Dynamics and Computational Models: A Review of Segmentation, Registration, and In Silico Growth Algorithms and their Clinical Applications. Current Medical Imaging Reviews 3, 176–262 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patriarche, J., Erickson, B.: A Review of the Automated Detection of Change in Serial Imaging Studies of the Brain. J. Digit. Imaging 17, 158–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettinger, G.J., Grimson, W.E.L., Lozano-Perez, T., Wells III, W.M., White, S.J., Kikinis, R.: Automatic registration for multiple sclerosis change detection. In: IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 297–306 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chui, H., Win, L., Schultz, R., Duncan, J.S., Rangarajan, A.: A unified non-rigid feature registration method for brain mapping. Med. Image. Anal. 7(2), 113–130 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davatzikos, C., Prince, J.L.: Brain image registration based on curve mapping. In: IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 245–254 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davatzikos, C., Prince, J.L., Bryan, R.N.: Image registration based on boundary mapping. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 15(1), 112–115 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Douglas, N.G., Bruce, F.: Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christensen, G.E.: Inverse consistent registration with object boundary constraints. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, vol. 1, pp. 591–594 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Talairach, J., Tournoux, P.: Co-planar stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme Medical Publishers (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verard, L., Allain, P., Travere, J.M., Baron, J.C., Bloyet, D.: Fully Automatic Identification of AC and PC Landmarks on Brain MRI Using Scene Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16(5), 610–616 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohr, K., Stiehl, H., Sprengel, R., Buzug, T., Weese, J., Kuhn, M.: Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines. IEEE Trans. Med. Img. 20(6), 526–534 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thirion, J.P.: New feature points based on geometric invariants for 3d image registration. Int. J. of Computer Vision 18(2), 121–137 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Viola, P.A., Wells, W.M.: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International Journal of Computer Vision 24(2), 137–154 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Penney, G.P., Weese, J., Little, J.A., Desmedt, P., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging 17, 586–594 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pluim, J., Maintz, J., Viergever, M.: Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging 19(8), 809–814 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzpatrick, J.M., West, J.B., Maurer, C.R.J.: Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 694–702 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jenkinson, M., Smith, S.: A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image. Anal. 5(2), 143–156 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations. JHU Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murray, R.M., Li, Z., Sastry, S.: A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demir, A., Unal, G., Karaman, K. (2010). Anatomical Landmark Based Registration of Contrast Enhanced T1-Weighted MR Images. In: Fischer, B., Dawant, B.M., Lorenz, C. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6204. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14366-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14366-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14366-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics