Abstract
Product software vendors have trouble defining their customer configuration updating process; release, delivery and deployment are generally underrated and thus less attention is paid to them. This paper presents an international benchmark survey providing statistical evidence that product software vendors who invest in the customer configuration updating process perceive that they are more successful than those who do not. Furthermore, the benchmark survey provides a vivid picture of the customer configuration updating practices of product software vendors and that customer configuration updating is an underdeveloped process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carzaniga, A., Fuggetta, A., Hall, R., van der Hoek, A., Heimbigner, D., Wolf, A.: A characterization framework for software deployment technologies (1998)
Hall, R.S., Heimbigner, D., Wolf, A.L.: A cooperative approach to support software deployment using the software dock. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 174–183 (1999)
Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Ballintijn, G.: A process framework and typology for software product updaters. In: Ninth Eur. Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 265–274. IEEE, Los Angeles (2005)
Brinkkemper, S., Xu, L.: Concepts for product software. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 531–541
Jansen, S., Ballintijn, G., Brinkkemper, S., van Nieuwland, A.: Integrated development and maintenance for the release, delivery, deployment, and customization of product software: a case study in mass-market ERP software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 18, 133–151 (2006)
Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Helms, R.: Benchmarking the Customer Configuration Updating Practices of Product Software Vendors, 82–91 (2008)
van der Schuur, H., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Becoming Responsive to Service Usage and Performance Changes by Applying Service Feedback Metrics to Software Maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 4th Intl. ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution and Evolvability, pp. 53–62 (2008)
Joint Technical Subcommittee between ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), Iso/iec 15504, a.k.a. spice (software process improvement and capability determination)
Dolstra, E.: Integrating software construction and software deployment. In: Westfechtel, B., van der Hoek, A. (eds.) SCM 2001 and SCM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2649, pp. 102–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Dolstra, E., Visser, E., de Jonge, M.: Imposing a memory management discipline on software deployment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)
Jansen, S.: Pheme: An infrastructure to enable any type of communication between a software vendor and an end-user . In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance 2007, tool demonstration (2007)
Fowler, J.F.J.: Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jansen, S., Buts, W., Brinkkemper, S., van der Hoek, A. (2010). Benchmarking the Customer Configuration Updating Process of the International Product Software Industry. In: Münch, J., Yang, Y., Schäfer, W. (eds) New Modeling Concepts for Today’s Software Processes. ICSP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14347-2_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14347-2_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14346-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14347-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)