Skip to main content

Deforesting Logical Form

  • Conference paper
  • 661 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6149))

Abstract

This paper argues against Logical Form (LF) as an intermediate level of representation in language processing. We apply a program transformation technique called deforestation to demonstrate the inessentiality of LF in a parsing system that builds semantic interpretations. We consider two phenomena, Quantifier Raising in English and Wh-movement in Chinese, which have played key roles in the broader argument for LF. Deforestation derives LF-free versions of these parsing systems. This casts doubt on LF’s relevance for processing models, contrary to suggestions in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berwick, R.C., Weinberg, A.S.: The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burge, W.H.: Recursive Programming Techniques. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Burstall, R., Darlington, J.: A transformation system for developing recursive programs. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 24(1), 44–67 (1977)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chomsky, N.: Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chomsky, N.: Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chomsky, N.: Approaching UG from below. In: Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.M. (eds.) Interfaces + recursion = language?: Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, pp. 1–29. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chomsky, N.: On phases. In: Freidin, R., Otero, C., Zubzarreta, M.-L. (eds.) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, pp. 133–166. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, R.H.: Montague’s Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, Umass (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curry, H.B., Feys, R.: Combinatory Logic, vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1958)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Curry, H.B., Hindley, J.R., Seldin, J.P.: Combinatory Logic, vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiengo, R.: Semantic Conditions on Surface Structure. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frost, R., Launchbury, J.: Constructing natural language interpreters in a lazy functional language. The Computer Journal 32(2), 108–121 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorn, S.: Explicit definitions and linguistic dominoes. In: Hart, J., Takasu, S. (eds.) Systems and Computer Science, University of Toronto Press (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hornstein, N.: Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism. Blackwell, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, C.T.J.: Logic relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge; edited version published by Garland, New York, 1998 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, C.T.J.: Move wh in a language without wh-movement. The linguistic review 1, 369–416 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, C.T.J., Li, Y.H.A., Li, Y.: The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobson, P.: Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8(2), 77–155 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, M.: Parsing as deduction: the use of knowledge of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(1), 105–128 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Larson, R., Segal, G.: Knowledge of meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. May, R.: The grammar of quantification. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wadler, P.: Transforming programs to eliminate trees. Theoretical Computer Science 73, 231–248 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, Z., Hale, J.T. (2010). Deforesting Logical Form. In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics