Advertisement

Agent Behavior Diagram for Intelligent Agents

  • Michal Radecký
  • Petr Gajdoš
  • Radoslav Fasuga
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 88)

Abstract

This paper describes our approach of modeling and developing Multi-Agent System (MAS) which extends traditional approach of process modeling. An Extended UML Activity Diagram has been proposed. Mentioned diagram makes the basis of the specification of agents behaviors and plays an important role within the process of agent reconfiguration.

Keywords

Agent ABD Agent Behavior Diagram UML Activity Diagram 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Verification of Workflow Nets. In: Azema, P., Balbo, G. (eds.) Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, pp. 407–426. Springer, Berlin (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kubik, A.: Intelligent Agents. Computer Press, Prague (publication in czech language)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Radecky, M., Gajdos, P.: Traffic Simulation and Intelligent agents. In: Sborník - IEEE: ICITST 2009, London, pp. 127–132. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radecky, M., Gajdos, P.: Reconfigurable Intelligent agents. In: Sborník UKSim 2008, pp. 543–548. IEEE, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Radecky, M., Gajdos, P.: Intelligent agents for Traffic Simulation. In: Sbornik SpringSim ADS 2008, Ottawa, pp. 109–115 (2008), ISBN 1-56555-319-5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radecky, M., Gajdos, P.: Process and Logic Approaches in the Inelligent agents Behavior. In: Duží, M., Jaakkola, H., Kiyoki, Y., Kangassalo, H. (eds.) Sborník Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XVIII, pp. 295–300. IOS Press, Amsterdam, ISBN 978-1-58603-710-9 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vondrak, I.: Methods of Business Modeling. VSB-TUO, Ostrava (2004) (lecture notes in Czech)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matjaz, B.J.: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services BPEL and BPEL4WS, 2nd edn. Packt Publishing, Birmingham (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pilone, D., Pitman, N.: UML 2.0 in a Nutshell. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, J.R.: Intelligent agents - Theories, Architectures and Languages. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Namee, B.M.: A Proposal for an Agent Architecture for Proactive Persistent Non Player Characters (2001), http://www.cs.tcd.ie/publications/tech.reports/reports.01/TCD-CS-2001-20.pdf
  12. 12.
    Zambonelli, F.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems: The Gaia Methodology, vol. 12(3). ACM, New York (July 2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferber, J.: Multi Agent Systems. In: An introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1993), ISBN 978-0201360486Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Radecky, M., Gajdos, P.: Process and Logic Approaches in the Inelligent agents Behavior. In: Du, M., Jaakkola, H., Kiyoki, Y., Kangassalo, H. (eds.) Sbornk Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XVIII, pp. 295–300. IOS Press, Amsterdam, ISBN 978-1-58603-710-9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal Radecký
    • 1
  • Petr Gajdoš
    • 1
  • Radoslav Fasuga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, FEIVSB - Technical University of OstravaOstrava-PorubaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations