Advertisement

Development Tool for End-to-End QoS Sensitive Frameworks and Technologies

  • Bogdan Iancu
  • Adrian Peculea
  • Vasile Teodor Dadarlat
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 88)

Abstract

This paper proposes a software development tool for the development and testing of end-to-end QoS sensitive frameworks and technologies. The development tool is a modular software system, which allows researchers to assess the performances and functionalities of different QoS frameworks and technologies using an experimental methodology, rather than using simulation environments. We describe and analyze the behavior of the proposed development tool by testing, in a comparative manner, two end-to-end QoS frameworks: On-Demand QoS Path framework (ODP) and Self-Adaptive Bandwidth Reconfiguration QoS framework (SAR).

Keywords

development tool end-to-end QoS experimental methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Park, K.I.: QoS in Packet Networks. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 779 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szigeti, T., Hattingh, C.: End-to-End QoS Network Design: Quality of Service in LANs, WANs and VPNs. Cisco Press (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang, M., Huang, Y., Kim, J., Lee, M., Suda, T., Daisuke, M.: An End-to-End QoS Framework with On-Demand Bandwidth Reconfiguration. Computer Communications 28, 2034–2046 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peculea, A., Dadarlat, V., Ignat, I., Iancu, B., Cobarzan, L.: On Developing a QoS Framework with Self-Adaptive Bandwidth Reconfiguration. Pollack Periodica An International Journal for Engineering and Information Sciences 4, 121–129 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stallings, W.: High-Speed Networks and Internets: Performance and Quality of Service, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    The Ns2 Simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Bryson, J., Lowe, W., Stein, L.A.: Hypothesis Testing for Complex Agents. In: NIST Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, pp. 233–240. NIST (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edmonds, B., Bryson, J.: The Insufficiency of Formal Design Methods the necessity of an experimental approach for the understanding and control of complex MAS. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 938–945. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes, A., Emmerich, W.: Using Programmable Network Management Techniques to Establish Experimental Networking Testbeds. BT Technology Journal 21, 195–203 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iancu, B., Peculea, A., Dadarlat, V., Ignat, I., Cebuc, E., Baruch, Z.: QoS Parameters’ Benchmarking System with Complex Traffic Pattern Definition. In: Proceeding of RoEduNet 6th International Conference, Sitech, Cluj-Napoca, pp. 44–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    WinPcap: The Windows Packet Capture Library, http://www.winpcap.org/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bogdan Iancu
    • 1
  • Adrian Peculea
    • 1
  • Vasile Teodor Dadarlat
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentTechnical University of Cluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations