Skip to main content

Cumulative Readings of Every Do Not Provide Evidence for Events and Thematic Roles

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6042))

Abstract

An argument by Kratzer (2000) based on Schein (1986, 1993) does not conclusively show that events and thematic roles are necessary ingredients of the logical representation of natural language sentences. The argument claims that cumulative readings of every can be represented only with these ingredients. But scope-splitting accounts make it possible to represent cumulative readings of every in an eventless framework. Such accounts are motivated by obligatory reconstruction effects of every and by crosslinguistic considerations. Kratzer proposes that agent but not theme occurs in the logical representation of sentences because this allows her to model subject-object asymmetries in the distribution of cumulative every. But the reason for these asymmetries seems to be that every must be c-commanded by another quantifier in order to cumulate with it, no matter what its thematic role is. So the distribution of cumulative every does not provide support for Kratzer’s proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bayer, S.L.: Confessions of a Lapsed Neo-Davidsonian: Events and Arguments in Compositional Semantics. Garland, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S., Sauerland, U.: Cumulation is needed: A reply to Winter 2000. Natural Language Semantics 8(4), 349–371 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasoveanu, A.: Modified numerals as post-suppositions. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Amsterdam Colloquium 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6042, pp. 203–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: Hale, K., Keyser, J. (eds.) The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: The logical form of action sentences. In: Rescher, N. (ed.) The logic of decision and action, pp. 81–95. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E.: Constituent Questions. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2), 157–196 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1), 63–96 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.): Truth, interpretation, information. Foris, Dordrecht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.: Determiners. Talk presented at On Linguistic Interfaces, Ulster (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Manuscript, ch. 2. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. Fink, München (published 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences. In: Galloway, T., Spence, J. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 6, Ithaca. CLC Publications, Cornell University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In: Turner, K. (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, pp. 257–291. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A.S.: The semantics of scope in English. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F.: Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.: Studies on quantification in Chinese. PhD thesis, University of California at Los Angeles (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W.: Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6, 201–243 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, use and interpretation of language, pp. 303–323. de Gruyter, Berlin (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. CSLI, Stanford (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F.-H.: Scope Dependency in English and Chinese. PhD thesis, University of California at Los Angeles (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, S.: (Non-)Maximality and distributivity: a decision theory approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 16), Tokyo, Japan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L.: Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9, 145–189 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: Events in the semantics of English. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.: Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U.: The meaning of chains. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U.: A new semantics for number. In: The Proceedings of SALT 13, Ithaca, N.Y, pp. 258–275. Cornell University/CLC-Publications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U.: The interpretation of traces. Natural Language Semantics 12, 63–127 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scha, R.: Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language, Mathematical Center Tracts, Amsterdam (1981); Reprinted in Groenendijk et al. (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B.: Event logic and the interpretation of plurals. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B.: Plurals and events. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B.: Plurals. In: Lepore, E., Smith, B.C. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R.: Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternefeld, W.: Reciprocity and cumulative predication. Natural Language Semantics 6, 303–337 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A. (ed.): Ways of scope taking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, E.: Dependent plurals and plural meaning. PhD thesis, NYU, New York, N.Y. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Champollion, L. (2010). Cumulative Readings of Every Do Not Provide Evidence for Events and Thematic Roles. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics