Skip to main content

Goal-Driven Autonomy with Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Book cover Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development (ICCBR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6176))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The vast majority of research on AI planning has focused on automated plan recognition, in which a planning agent is provided with a set of inputs that include an initial goal (or set of goals). In this context, the goal is presumed to be static; it never changes, and the agent is not provided with the ability to reason about whether it should change this goal. For some tasks in complex environments, this constraint is problematic; the agent will not be able to respond to opportunities or plan execution failures that would benefit from focusing on a different goal. Goal driven autonomy (GDA) is a reasoning framework that was recently introduced to address this limitation; GDA systems perform anytime reasoning about what goal(s) should be satisfied [4]. Although promising, there are natural roles that case-based reasoning (CBR) can serve in this framework, but no such demonstration exists. In this paper, we describe the GDA framework and describe an algorithm that uses CBR to support it. We also describe an empirical study with a multiagent gaming environment in which this CBR algorithm outperformed a rule-based variant of GDA as well as a non-GDA agent that is limited to dynamic replanning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. von Moltke, H.K.B.G.: Militarische werke. In: Hughes, D.J. (ed.) Moltke on the art of war: Selected writings. Presidio Press, Novato (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dearden, R., Meuleau, N., Ramakrishnan, S., Smith, D., Washington, R.: Incremental contingency planning. In: Pistore, M., Geffner, H., Smith, D. (eds.) Planning under Uncertainty and Incomplete Information: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop, Trento, Italy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman, R., Boddy, M.: Expressive planning and explicit knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, pp. 110–117. AAAI Press, Edinburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muñoz-Avila, H., Aha, D.W., Jaidee, U., Klenk, M., Molineaux, M.: Applying goal directed autonomy to a team shooter game. To appear in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. AAAI Press, Daytona Beach (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Molineaux, M., Klenk, M., Aha, D.W.: Goal-driven autonomy in a Navy strategy simulation. To appear in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Atlanta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. López de Mantaras, R., McSherry, D., Bridge, D.G., Leake, D.B., Smyth, B., Craw, S., Faltings, B., Maher, M.L., Cox, M.T., Forbus, K.D., Keane, M., Aamodt, A., Watson, I.D.: Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20(3), 215–240 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Auslander, B., Lee-Urban, S., Hogg, C., Munoz-Avila, H.: Recognizing the enemy: Combining reinforcement learning with strategy selection using case-based reasoning. In: Althoff, K.-D., Bergmann, R., Minor, M., Hanft, A. (eds.) ECCBR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5239, pp. 59–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nau, D.S.: Current trends in automated planning. AI Magazine 28(4), 43–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., Muñoz-Avila, H.: SHOP: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 968–973. AAAI Press, Stockholm (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, M.T.: Perpetual self-aware cognitive agents. AI Magazine 28(1), 32–45 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, M., Gerevini, A., Long, D., Serina, I.: Plan stability: Replanning versus plan repair. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pp. 212–221. AAAI Press, Cumbria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Warfield, I., Hogg, C., Lee-Urban, S., Munoz-Avila, H.: Adaptation of hierarchical task network plans. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Flairs International Conference, pp. 429–434. AAAI Press, Key West (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoang, H., Lee-Urban, S., Muñoz-Avila, H.: Hierarchical plan representations for encoding strategic game AI. In: Proceedings of the First Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 63–68. AAAI Press, Marina del Ray (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ayan, N.F., Kuter, U., Yaman, F., Hotride, G. R.: Hierarchical ordered task replanning in dynamic environments. In: Ingrand, F., Rajan, K. (eds.) Planning and Plan Execution for Real-World Systems – Principles and Practices for Planning in Execution: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop, Providence, RI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Myers, K.L.: CPEF: A continuous planning and execution framework. AI Magazine 20(4), 63–69 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ghallab, M., Nau, D.S., Traverso, P.: Automated planning: Theory and practice. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Briel, M., Sanchez Nigenda, R., Do, M.B., Kambhampati, S.: Effective approaches for partial satisfaction (over-subscription) planning. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 562–569. AAAI Press, San Jose (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coddington, A.M., Luck, M.: Towards motivation-based plan evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International FLAIRS Conference, pp. 298–302. AAAI Press, Miami Beach (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meneguzzi, F.R., Luck, M.: Motivations as an abstraction of meta-level reasoning. In: Burkhard, H.-D., Lindemann, G., Verbrugge, R., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4696, pp. 204–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergmann, R.: Experience management: Foundations, development methodology, and internet-based applications. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muñoz-Avila, H., Jaidee, U., Aha, D.W., Carter, E. (2010). Goal-Driven Autonomy with Case-Based Reasoning. In: Bichindaritz, I., Montani, S. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development. ICCBR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14273-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14274-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics